David Fotland wrote in a related thread:
Many Faces does not test for mirror go.
But it is able to produce really great cinema
against mirror go.
Today I ran a test game with MF 12.013.
Board size 13
Chinese Rules, but with komi=-45.5 (in words minus fourtyfive-dot-five).
Many Faces as White
2009/7/20 Stefan Kaitschick stefan.kaitsch...@hamburg.de:
Ofcourse they can know. They just have to check for it.
Those programs that do well against mirror go probably all do check for it.
I think a strong MCTS could find the lines that make mirror Go
useless. Maybe MF plays lines that brake
2009/7/22 Andrés Domínguez andres...@gmail.com
2009/7/20 Stefan Kaitschick stefan.kaitsch...@hamburg.de:
Ofcourse they can know. They just have to check for it.
Those programs that do well against mirror go probably all do check for
it.
I think a strong MCTS could find the lines that make
But go programs do not KNOW they are playing mirror go and would have no
motivation to specifically set this up. So how is it that some equally
strong programs have no problem while others do?
I wondered if some programs prefer contact moves more? In which case the
chances of them attaching
It could be a matter of style as you say, not a matter of strength.My
main questions is whether it's been established as true that Zen really
plays poorly and Many Faces is brilliant against mirror go.Or does it
just seem that way based on casual observation?
The only reason I make an
Don Dailey wrote:
It could be a matter of style as you say, not a matter of strength.My
main questions is whether it's been established as true that Zen really
plays poorly and Many Faces is brilliant against mirror go.Or does it
just seem that way based on casual observation?
The only
