Just curious, why in the statistics it is mentioned 1475 players and in
the list only 602. Does the list mention only players having playing
recently ?
2015-07-29 21:32 GMT+02:00 Rémi Coulom remi.cou...@free.fr:
Lee Hajin is also quite a bit weaker than Yoda Norimoto or Cho Chikun.
BTW,
RE: CNNs: They can be, and have been, successfully applied to movies as
well. See http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~rahuls/pub/cvpr2014-deepvideo-rahuls.pdf
Also, in the first .pdf I linked you, the input layer has a notion of age
of the stones. For example, this stone was played 5 moves ago, this one 3
Thanks for the link to the CMU CNN paper, Steven, which was very
interesting. I noted with some pleasure that they included a fovea stream
- although maybe that is a bit of a misnomer, as whereas animal foveas roam
around the image, building (i think) a symbolic structural description of
the
Yes. The list contains only players that have at least one win, one
loss, and one game in the past year.
I will also produce historical rating lists for each month of the past.
That will be online soon.
Rémi
On 08/03/2015 04:44 PM, Xavier Combelle wrote:
Just curious, why in the statistics
Hi,
The problem is not wheter to use Elo ratings or not, but rather how to
compute them. The intro of my WHR paper gives an overview of different
possible approaches:
http://www.remi-coulom.fr/WHR/WHR.pdf
The algorithms I compare in my paper all have a major flaw: they
consider the
