Re: [Computer-go] Commercial Go software and high-end users

Chess was popular everywhere so the barriers were relatively small. As one chess writer said it. There are moer chess titles written than all other hobby titles combined. Dunno who reads all of them. But I do doubt if strong go programs give too much for analysis. Even if they are 1p and can show

Re: [Computer-go] Commercial Go software and high-end users

Hi! Couple of ideas. On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 06:19:39AM +0200, "Ingo Althöfer" wrote: > One point is: The absolute strength of the program need not to be > better than the strength of the player who uses it for analysis purposes. > It is enough that the program is tactically strong. But

Re: [Computer-go] Chinese AI challenge to AlphaGo

"Marco Scheurer" > Does anybody have any recent information about this project, or know how to > get in touch with this team? Their KGS Account (GoBeta) was last active on April 27. https://www.gokgs.com/gameArchives.jsp?user=gobeta=2016=4 I have a contact address but am not

[Computer-go] Chinese AI challenge to AlphaGo

Hi, Does anybody have any recent information about this project, or know how to get in touch with this team? Thanks, marco Marco Scheurer ma...@sente.ch ___ Computer-go mailing list Computer-go@computer-go.org