Re: [Computer-go] Significance of resignation in AGZ

2017-12-02 Thread Brian Sheppard via Computer-go
I implemented the ad hoc rule of not training on positions after the first pass, and my program is basically playing moves until the first pass is forced. (It is not a “zero” program, so I don’t mind ad hoc rules like this.) From: Computer-go [mailto:computer-go-boun...@computer-go.org] On

Re: [Computer-go] Significance of resignation in AGZ

2017-12-02 Thread Xavier Combelle
It might make sense to enable resignation threshold even on stupid level. As such the first thing the network should learn would be not to resign to early (even before not passing) Le 02/12/2017 à 18:17, Brian Sheppard via Computer-go a écrit : > > I have some hard data now. My network’s initial

Re: [Computer-go] Significance of resignation in AGZ

2017-12-02 Thread Brian Sheppard via Computer-go
I have some hard data now. My network’s initial training reached the same performance in half the iterations. That is, the steepness of skill gain in the first day of training was twice as great when I avoided training on fill-ins. The has all the usual caveats: only one run before/after,