Re: [computer-go] Gongo: Go in Go

2009-12-16 Thread Brian Slesinsky
Oops, you're right. Here it is with -server: Plug-and-Go refbot:17857 CRef bot (-O3) 12500 Gongo 1 Java bot: 1 CRef bot (no optimization) 5882 On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Mark Boon tesujisoftw...@gmail.com wrote: The

Re: [computer-go] Gongo: Go in Go

2009-12-16 Thread Don Dailey
That's pretty impressive for the go language if this is an apples to apples comparison. Is it pretty much? On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Brian Slesinsky br...@slesinsky.orgwrote: Oops, you're right. Here it is with -server: Plug-and-Go refbot:17857 CRef bot (-O3)

Re: [computer-go] Gongo: Go in Go

2009-12-15 Thread Brian Slesinsky
Okay, I added a few more timings (playouts / second, very rough): Plug-and-Go refbot:        14700 CRef bot (-O3)             12500 Gongo                      1 Java bot:                   6500 CRef bot (no optimization)  5882 Note that Gongo and Plug-and-Go are using different board data

Re: [computer-go] Gongo: Go in Go

2009-12-15 Thread Mark Boon
The relative values look about right. But I remember getting much higher numbers. Did you run the Java versions with or without the -server parameter? Mark On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Brian Slesinsky br...@slesinsky.org wrote: Okay, I added a few more timings (playouts / second, very

Re: [computer-go] Gongo: Go in Go

2009-12-13 Thread Jason House
Even a comparison against the java refbot's performance would be good. IIRC, my D port of the java refbot was within about 1% Sent from my iPhone On Dec 13, 2009, at 12:01 AM, Brian Slesinsky br...@slesinsky.org wrote: I'd like to, but I can't find it. Where do I download it? 2009/12/12

Re: [computer-go] Gongo: Go in Go

2009-12-13 Thread Brian Slesinsky
Javabot is at about 6.5k but they're not really comparable anymore, because I added an array to keep track of the liberties for each point. On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Jason House jason.james.ho...@gmail.com wrote: Even a comparison against the java refbot's performance would be good. IIRC,

Re: [computer-go] Gongo: Go in Go

2009-12-13 Thread Darren Cook
Javabot is at about 6.5k but they're not really comparable anymore, because I added an array to keep track of the liberties for each point. Do you mean you added the array to Gongo or to the java version? I.e. is Gongo twice as quick as the java version because the java version is doing more,

Re: [computer-go] Gongo: Go in Go

2009-12-13 Thread Brian Slesinsky
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Darren Cook dar...@dcook.org wrote: Do you mean you added the array to Gongo or to the java version? I.e. is Gongo twice as quick as the java version because the java version is doing more, or twice as quick even though it is also doing more? Gongo is faster

[computer-go] Gongo: Go in Go

2009-12-12 Thread Brian Slesinsky
Thought I'd announce that I've ported the Java refbot to the Go language (with some modifications). I'm getting about 10,000 random playouts/second on 9x9 using a single thread on a 32-bit iMac, using the gc compiler, which doesn't do any optimization. I suspect that a board structure that

Re: [computer-go] Gongo: Go in Go

2009-12-12 Thread Don Dailey
That's awesome! Do you have performance numbers on the same hardware for the C refbot? - Don On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Brian Slesinsky br...@slesinsky.orgwrote: Thought I'd announce that I've ported the Java refbot to the Go language (with some modifications). I'm getting about

Re: [computer-go] Gongo: Go in Go

2009-12-12 Thread Brian Slesinsky
I'd like to, but I can't find it. Where do I download it? 2009/12/12 Don Dailey dailey@gmail.com: That's awesome! Do you have performance numbers on the same hardware for the C refbot? - Don On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Brian Slesinsky br...@slesinsky.org wrote: Thought I'd