Thanks, the dictionary is really great.
Chrilly
- Original Message -
From: David Silver
To: computer-go@computer-go.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 11:29 PM
Subject: [computer-go] Re: Explanation to MoGo paper wanted. (BackGammonCode)
It's because Go is not only game
I wonder whether the use of games as a metaphor would make general
machine learning concepts more easily understood by non-specialists?
That is, if you took a machine learning paper and rewrote it in terms
of games, would that make it easier or harder to understand for people
unfamiliar with both
Isn't there room for both? Shouldn't we present our work within our own
community, but also make efforts to share our ideas with others?
Yes, I do this by writing popular articles about computer-chess and games
programming.
The point of concern is: One is only considered important if one
the language of mathematics is perhaps the most universal language for
computer scientists. pseudocode comes in somewhere after that, and well-known
algorithms probably somewhere inbetween. game programming is an application
of computer science, and the language of game programming isn't
the language of mathematics is perhaps the most universal language for
computer scientists. pseudocode comes in somewhere after that, and well-known
algorithms probably somewhere inbetween. game programming is an application
of computer science, and the language of game programming isn't
