Similar to normal RAVE: Initially it was weighted 1:0 with UCT,
eventually 0:1 with UCT. I think it reached zero weight after about
5000 games.
Am 25.07.2009 um 00:59 schrieb Peter Drake:
Did you weigh these data as heavily as the raw Monte Carlo data, or
discount them somehow?
On Jul
We have data on moves made from this node. This is the raw Monte Carlo
data.
We also have data on moves made after this node in playouts. This is
the RAVE data. It is noisier than the Monte Carlo data, but we can
gather it much more quickly.
Is anyone also using a global table of moves
My program performed worse with this (about 50 elo), but I didn't
combine it with RAVE (just pure UCT with this).
Am 25.07.2009 um 00:38 schrieb Peter Drake:
Is anyone also using a global table of moves made after ALL nodes in
the search, a sort of global RAVE table? It would be noisier
Did you weigh these data as heavily as the raw Monte Carlo data, or
discount them somehow?
On Jul 24, 2009, at 3:50 PM, Isaac Deutsch wrote:
My program performed worse with this (about 50 elo), but I didn't
combine it with RAVE (just pure UCT with this).
Am 25.07.2009 um 00:38 schrieb
