mike wrote:
I have to ask...you are willing to pay upwards of 70 bux for feet on a case?
What is it about this case you like so much?
Mike
At first, I didn't understand, what you meant, when, you mentioned $70
but, when you included the link on E-Bay, then I knew what you meant.
The
Here is a picture of my case: Antec KS188
http://www.antec.com/us/support_productInfo_details.php?ProdID=11193#
A case with a face that only its motherboard could love.
So why so much fuss over feet? I don't get it.
* ==
First thing I'd try is a new (late model) card reader. Just one that attaches
externally via a USB port. And new enough that it has address space in its
controller chip for today's large media. I'm just guessing that this is a
similar issue to the inability of older motherboards and external
I bought a new camera for me. It has capability to use SDHC media. I bought a
48 gig media. they are formatted differently.
when I plug the schc card into the correct slot for an SD media on my '06
compaq amd, the computor locks up. screen is wiped. get a message that control
panel is not
I have to ask...you are willing to pay upwards of 70 bux for feet on a
case? What is it about this case you like so much?
Mike
On Dec 7, 2007 11:47 PM, Christopher Range [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Wright wrote:
A complete case on eBay:
Which is basically what I asked way back before this thread became the
monster it has. Someone _else_ said they needed soft feet because they had
to pull theirs out all the time, but they never gave a good reason for doing
that and Chris never answered the question at all.
Besides, there's no
Compatible exclusively with digital cameras and camcorders that support
Secure Digital High Capacity memory cards; Note: legacy Secure Digital
devices are not compatible
Please tell us what make and model camera so we can approach it with
caution.
I have a new panasonic. however canon, fuji,nikon, all have adapted the new
technology. do a search on SDHC to find out about it. formatted differently,
and up to 32mb in size, and up to 6mb r/w speeds. you can still use old chips
in the cameras, but with the sd (2gig?) chip limit.
Tony B wrote:
Which is basically what I asked way back before this thread became the monster
it has. Someone _else_ said they needed soft feet because they had to pull
theirs out all the time, but they never gave a good reason for doing that and
Chris never answered the question at all.
I
Tom Piwowar wrote:
Here is a picture of my case: Antec KS188
http://www.antec.com/us/support_productInfo_details.php?ProdID=11193#
A case with a face that only its motherboard could love.
So why so much fuss over feet? I don't get it.
Thankyou for insult, I bet your computer looks
watch out tom, new technology roaring down the road.
you still using that canon FDt from 1970 or do you have a pre war (II)
leica rangefinder?
Which war? Even my digital cameras can be called pre war.
* == QUICK
I've tried 1and1 and they are also good. I have dropped them in
favor of bluehost.com -- they are similar. My experience is
bluehost's support is more knowledgeable.
Thanks gayley. I just took a look at BlueHost and it does look good.
Their control panel is very clear and easy to use. Lots of
At 12:39 PM 12/8/2007, you wrote:
watch out tom, new technology roaring down the road.
you still using that canon FDt from 1970 or do you have a pre war (II)
leica rangefinder?
Which war? Even my digital cameras can be called pre war.
Please note (II) to designate what here in the united
At 11:58 AM 12/8/2007, gerald wrote:
watch out tom, new technology roaring down the road.
you still using that canon FDt from 1970 or do you have a pre war (II) leica
rangefinder?
Leica rangefinder was great. Would that it were alive today but with a digital
sensor. Focusing was sure and as
http://www.steves-digicams.com/pdf/sdhc.pdf
Thanks for the link. This is a piece of new technology I missed. Another
reason this list is so valuable.
* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in ==
*
Manual focus on today's cameras is still motorized (slow) and doesn't have
any fine adjustment. The merest tap on the manual focusing control (and
the zoom control as well) moves the adjustment a considerable distance,
often too far.
With digital displays as coarse as they are you have to
If I do a full re-installation of XP (i.e. not a repair or upgrade, but a full
overwrite on my C: partition) what all will be destroyed besides the Windows
folder and my users' settings (and I assume all the my documents etc for each
user)?
Does the reinstall just overwrite Windows-specific
If you don't choose to format the drive, it will just overwrite the Windows
specific files, like the Registry and all the Service Packs or monthly
patches.
It won't delete any My Documents folders or the like. If you have any user
settings in folders, like for Firefox, those will remain. If the
John H. Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I am using Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 on my Mac G5 at 10.39
Somewhere during one of the point upgrades I lost the ability to see any
header info. Normal or all.
No help at the Knowledge base.
Any ideas, am I missing a setting somewhere?
So are you going to tell us or keep us in suspense?
Mike
On Dec 8, 2007 8:59 AM, Christopher Range [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike wrote:
I have to ask...you are willing to pay upwards of 70 bux for feet on a
case? What is it about this case you like so much?
Mike
At first, I didn't
I just need a blank template of a keypad to note some key assignments. I can
handle virtually any format. Search engines are failing terribly on this
one.
* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in
Thanks to Tony and John for answers to my previous question. A related
question as a follow up, please.
Next week I am going to take delivery of a new Dell XPS with Vista
preloaded. I want to drop in a second hard drive from my current machine –
that drive happens to be my current XP boot
mike wrote:
So are you going to tell us or keep us in suspense?
Mike
I haven't been outbid yet but, there is more than a day, left in the
auction. I guess I don't need the feet but, I always thought, part of
the ventilation for the case was on the bottom.
Christopher
No, I haven't ever seen a case that took in any appreciable amount of air
from the bottom.
If you're interested in max cooling, leave your case *open*. Point a fan at
it.
On Dec 9, 2007 12:18 AM, Christopher Range [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been outbid yet but, there is more than a
The whole point of my query is to NOT have to install/reinstall XP at
all, but to use the perfectly well-tweaked and up-to-date version I
already have.
Unless your new machine has the same chipset and other hardware that your
current machine has, all you will get, most likely, are blue screens
25 matches
Mail list logo
