Re: [concordance-devel] Windows harmony users...

2008-03-14 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Marco Bleich wrote: However, there were about 25 errors when I turned on strict ANSI checking which I've fixed and committed. Give it a whirl and email me any errors. Ok. Buildlog is attached: 36 error(s), 78 warning(s). I'm sorry! And another one: Please check the symbol

Re: [concordance-devel] Windows harmony users...

2008-03-14 Thread Stephen Warren
On Fri, March 14, 2008 11:09 am, Phil Dibowitz wrote: Stephen Warren wrote: On Fri, March 14, 2008 2:23 am, Phil Dibowitz wrote: That said, it appears that variables declared not at the top was in fact not part of the c89 spec. But there was definitely pre-ANSI C. I'm annoyed that gcc

Re: [concordance-devel] Windows harmony users...

2008-03-14 Thread Kevin Gilbert
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Stephen Warren opined: I guess alternatively -Werror might do the trick, together with the -W you mentioned. That also has some potential for other negative fallout though. Probably a silly question, but why the move from *.cpp to *.c? Why not leave concordance as a

[concordance-devel] Firmware FF patterns replacements

2008-03-14 Thread Stephen Warren
The following is extracted purely from firmware files and USB logs, from both Kevin's zip and my upgrade attempts: remote, arch, fw version, d/l pattern, write pattern 550 9 2.2.3 8xFF 3a8d4847 628 7 3.04xFF 234d4847 659 7 4.14xFF ad8d4847 670 7 4.14xFF b4de4847