On 01/03/2013 07:59 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
Unfortunately, no it cannot. It needs to be able to store/act on that
information, and it can't do that without its pointer.
Did you have any further thoughts on this? I suppose we could just add
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
- cb(LC_CB_STAGE_RESET, 0, 0, 2, LC_CB_COUNTER_TYPE_STEPS,
cb_arg);
+ cb(LC_CB_STAGE_RESET, 0, 0, 2, LC_CB_COUNTER_TYPE_STEPS,
+ cb_arg, NULL);
Why the line-wrap here? cb_arg fits in under 80 chars. And
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
Other than that, I think this looks great. I'd like to take one more look at
it when it's not super late but I think other than the two minor things above
we're good to go.
Different thought. Congruity and libconcord currently differ a bit in how
