Re: [concordance-devel] Build failure with latest CVS

2008-03-31 Thread Stephen Warren
On Sun, March 30, 2008 11:41 pm, Phil Dibowitz wrote: And again, you missed what I said about declarations not at the top. This is why we use -ansi -pedantic-errors: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ gcc -std=c99 foo.c [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ gcc -std=c99 -pedantic-errors foo.c [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$

Re: [concordance-devel] Build failure with latest CVS

2008-03-31 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Stephen Warren wrote: * It certainly won't remove the warning about strdup not being prototyped (that's due to -ansi), which is a warning for me, but I believe an error on gcc-4.3 (hence why I submitted the patch for libconcord to add a bunch of headers to help packaging libconcord on Fedora 9

Re: [concordance-devel] Build failure with latest CVS

2008-03-31 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Stephen Warren wrote: Phil Dibowitz wrote: Stephen Warren wrote: * It certainly won't remove the warning about strdup not being prototyped (that's due to -ansi), which is a warning for me, but I believe an error on gcc-4.3 (hence why I submitted the patch for libconcord to add a bunch of

Re: [concordance-devel] Build failure with latest CVS

2008-03-31 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Stephen Warren wrote: Phil Dibowitz wrote: Stephen Warren wrote: * It certainly won't remove the warning about strdup not being prototyped (that's due to -ansi), which is a warning for me, but I believe an error on gcc-4.3 (hence why I submitted the patch for libconcord to add a bunch of