Fixed. If you could confirm that CVS now compiles cleanly on Windows
before
you leave, that'd be great.
Everything is ok now (with all three compilers), except two warnings I get
with VS2005/2008 in 'remote_z.cpp':
- snip -
..\remote_z.cpp(130) : warning C4333: '' : right shift by too large
Marco Bleich wrote:
Phil:
Everything looks fine!
Compiles clean now. I'm going to make some checks later this day and send
you the project files.
Sorry, ive been a bit busy. See attached files.
Applied, thanks.
--
Phil Dibowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Open Source
Marco Bleich wrote:
However, there were about 25 errors when I turned on strict ANSI
checking
which I've fixed and committed. Give it a whirl and email me any errors.
Ok.
Buildlog is attached: 36 error(s), 78 warning(s). I'm sorry!
And another one:
Please check the symbol
On Fri, March 14, 2008 11:09 am, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
Stephen Warren wrote:
On Fri, March 14, 2008 2:23 am, Phil Dibowitz wrote:
That said, it appears that variables declared not at the top was in
fact
not
part of the c89 spec. But there was definitely pre-ANSI C.
I'm annoyed that gcc
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Stephen Warren opined:
I guess alternatively -Werror might do the trick, together with the -W you
mentioned. That also has some potential for other negative fallout though.
Probably a silly question, but why the move from *.cpp to *.c? Why not leave
concordance as a
BTW: concordance compiles OK for me so I'm not sure what's going wrong for
you
so I'll leave that to others.
I'm using VC++ 6.0 and VS2005/2008 on Windows OS. I get it compiled if I
rename it back to cpp of course. Anyway either the source will be modified
or I have to look for the correct
Anyway either the source will be modified or I have to look for the
correct compiler switch...
Forget about the correct compiler switch. As far as I have found out
(googeled) Microsoft compilers (VC++ 6.0, VS2005 and VS2008) have no
official or inofficial C99 support. So I think it's either
Ah, crap. I didn't request those to be moved. I can do that, but before I=
do, let me make sure you're OK with what I'm thinking.
/win/concordance.dsw
/win/concordance.sln
/concordance/win/concordance.dsp
/concordance/win/concordance.vcproj
Marco Bleich wrote:
Ah, crap. I didn't request those to be moved. I can do that, but before I=
do, let me make sure you're OK with what I'm thinking.
/win/concordance.dsw
/win/concordance.sln
/concordance/win/concordance.dsp
/concordance/win/concordance.vcproj
Phil Dibowitz wrote:
Marco Bleich wrote:
It probably won't be very easy for you to make the files until after I've
made CVS look like the above structure,
Yep, right. You could build the new structure, commit it to CVS and then I
will adapt/modify the project files. It would definitely help
10 matches
Mail list logo
