Standing Issue in Pledge of Allegiance Case

** Daniel O. Conkle Professor of Law Indiana University School of Law Bloomington, Indiana 47405 (812) 855-4331 fax (812) 855-0555 e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** -Original Message-From: Sam Bagenstos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October

Re: Precedent Originalism: Was Scalia, Textualism, and Printz

** Daniel O. Conkle Professor of Law Indiana University School of Law Bloomington, Indiana 47405 (812) 855-4331 fax (812) 855-0555 e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** -Original Message- From: Larry Solum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday

Justices Take Case on Pledge of Allegiance's 'God' Reference

. . . . . . Dan Conkle ** Daniel O. Conkle Professor of Law Indiana University School of Law Bloomington, Indiana 47405 (812) 855-4331 fax (812) 855-0555 e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] **

Re: Presidents and the Court

This may not be directly relevant to the criminal versus non-criminal distinction, but I think the general question was debated in Congress during the Clinton impeachment proceedings, with President Clinton's defenders arguing that the standard for impeaching the President (at least) should be

Alabama Justices Order Ten Commandments Monument Removed

story on NY Times web site - free subscription required] Dan Conkle ** Daniel O. Conkle Professor of Law Indiana University School of Law Bloomington, Indiana 47405 (812) 855-4331 fax (812) 855-0555 e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] **

Bowers Overruled

upon Casey and Romer, as well as Stevens' dissent in Bowers.He suggest that the history of sodomy regulation should not be understood as it was in Bowers, but he then appears to adopt more of an evolving values approach. Dan Conkle ** Daniel O. Conkle