law professors
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sanford Levinson
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WELFARE, FOREST FIRES, AND THE CONSTITUTION
Jonathan Adler writes:
At 03:13 PM 10/30/2003, you wrote:
Insofar as a plausible case could be made
I am genuinely curious as to how political and constitutional conservatives
justify taxing national taxpayers in order to pay for eminently foreseeable
disasters in California. (I keep hearing that these are the most serious
forest fires in ten years. One of the things this tells me is that a
Sandy,
Can you identify a "conservative" (and politicians don't count, you can't expect intellectual consistency from them) who has argued that California deserves aid, but "victims of structural unemployment" do not?
In a message dated 10/30/2003 3:41:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL
44106
ph) 216-368-2535
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Discussion list for con law professors
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sanford Levinson
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WELFARE, FOREST FIRES, AND THE CONSTITUTION
I am
/volume4.html
Cheers,
John Eastman
-Original Message-
From: Sanford Levinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 12:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WELFARE, FOREST FIRES, AND THE CONSTITUTION
I am genuinely curious as to how political and constitutional
