Re: svn commit: r509415 [1/3] - in /maven/continuum/trunk: continuum-security/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/security/profile/ continuum-webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/continuum/web/a

2007-02-19 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 2/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: oching Date: Mon Feb 19 18:41:37 2007 New Revision: 509415 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=509415 Log: Added isAuthorized* methods in ContinuumActionSupport for checking authorization in action classes with different

Re: Security in Continuum

2006-01-14 Thread Trygve Laugstøl
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:13 +0100, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, In 1.1, we have decided to rework all security features. I haven't looked at osuser in particular yet, but I still think it might work for us. Anyway I'm suggesting the following strategy: 1) Make a set of Continuum-specific

Re: Security in Continuum

2006-01-12 Thread Brett Porter
Seraph also wraps around osuser, I believe. I think that standalone should be a secondary concern (a nice to have). I think as long as it can be backed by the same permissions data, the web part is the hard part we don't want to have to reproduce and maintain. I'd go with further investigation