Brett Porter wrote:
I've turned off the CI build for continuum-1.0.x, since the development
focus will all be on trunk now.
I'm not sure if we should svn rm the branch to save confusion, or move
it, or just leave it there. Any thoughts?
I'd prefer to leave it, at least for a while, as
I think we'll can remove it when trunk will be in a stable state. I'm not agree to remove the more
stable branch even if it isn't the development branch.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
I've turned off the CI build for continuum-1.0.x, since the development
focus will all be on trunk now.
Brett Porter wrote:
Yep, I agree with you both. Perhaps removing it after the 1.1 release is
the most appropriate.
+1, and include the last known rev in the README.txt :)
--
Trygve
theoretically it shouldn't have changed since the last tag :)
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
Yep, I agree with you both. Perhaps removing it after the 1.1 release
is the most appropriate.
+1, and include the last known rev in the README.txt :)
--
Trygve
--
Brett Porter
: +1 (416) 998-6023 + cell: +1 (410) 900-0796
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 3:50 AM
To: Continuum Developers
Subject: branch CI turned off
I've turned off the CI build for continuum-1.0.x, since the development
focus will all
-0796
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 4:04 AM
To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: branch CI turned off
Yep, I agree with you both. Perhaps removing it after the 1.1 release is
the most appropriate.
- Brett
Emmanuel
