Re: Confused about the branches

2008-03-10 Thread Olivier Lamy 
IMHO, we can remove.

2008/3/10, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  There are some other branches residing in Continuum SVN. Should we
  remove any (or all) of the following if they are not in active
  development? I know (id-refactor and key-based-refactor can go)

  # continuum-acegi
  # continuum-site_1.1
  # gbuild
  # id-refactor
  # key-based-refactor
  # osworkflow-integration
  # release-integration

  Cheers,
  Rahul


  Brett Porter wrote:
   Hi,
  
   I'm a bit confused about the current branch scenarios, we have 1.2 on a
   branch and 2.0 on trunk. Several changes have been made on each, and
   none merged to the other.
  
   Can I suggest we merge all branch changes to trunk, rename trunk to
   1.2-SNAPSHOT, and the branch to continuum-1.1.x (1.1.1-SNAPSHOT) and use
   that for bugfixes only?
  
   WDYT?

 
   - Brett
  
   --
   Brett Porter
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: svn commit: r635719 - in /continuum/trunk: ./ continuum-api/ continuum-commons/ continuum-configuration/ continuum-core/ continuum-data-management/ continuum-data-management/continuum-legacy/ cont

2008-03-10 Thread Brett Porter 


On 11/03/2008, at 9:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


-  value${JAVA_HOME}/value
+  value${java.homr}/value


java.home?



-  value${M2_HOME}/value
+  value${m2.home}/value


maven.home?

:)

- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/

Re: Confused about the branches

2008-03-10 Thread Rahul Thakur 


The branches have been removed except for 'continuum-site_1.1' which had 
some updates a few months ago. If this is not required please feel free 
to remove.


Rahul


Olivier Lamy wrote:

IMHO, we can remove.

2008/3/10, Rahul Thakur[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  There are some other branches residing in Continuum SVN. Should we
  remove any (or all) of the following if they are not in active
  development? I know (id-refactor and key-based-refactor can go)

  # continuum-acegi
  # continuum-site_1.1
  # gbuild
  # id-refactor
  # key-based-refactor
  # osworkflow-integration
  # release-integration

  Cheers,
  Rahul


  Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
  
I'm a bit confused about the current branch scenarios, we have 1.2 on a
branch and 2.0 on trunk. Several changes have been made on each, and
none merged to the other.
  
Can I suggest we merge all branch changes to trunk, rename trunk to
1.2-SNAPSHOT, and the branch to continuum-1.1.x (1.1.1-SNAPSHOT) and use
that for bugfixes only?
  
WDYT?

- Brett
  
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/