Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-05 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Some comments Database vs xml: definitely database. Throwing away the db access api (JDO/JPA/...) now that it's already there doesnt make much sense. Maybe there are implementations that use xml for storage and that's where you'd need to look if you want file storage Spring vs Guice vs Plexus:

RE: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-05 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1. I was about to query on this + archiva earlier as I saw various discussions on their dev lists. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Emmanuel Venisse Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 3:07 PM To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-05 Thread Rahul Thakur
+1 Rahul Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP. Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven PMC to apply for graduation. [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Emmanuel Establish the Apache Continuum Project WHEREAS, the Board

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-05 Thread Maria Odea Ching
+1 -Deng On Feb 6, 2008 7:06 AM, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP. Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven PMC to apply for graduation. [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Emmanuel

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-05 Thread Henry Isidro
This is great news +1 On Feb 6, 2008 10:00 AM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 -Deng On Feb 6, 2008 7:06 AM, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP. Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-05 Thread Napoleon Esmundo C. Ramirez
Just some thoughts, I strongly agree to the proposed technology changes, particularly in the database, as it will definitely improve the storage performance. In line with the objectives to make Continuum a slick CI server, I think the design changes is a good move as well. In my opinion, having

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-05 Thread Napoleon Esmundo C. Ramirez
+1 On Feb 6, 2008 10:06 AM, Henry Isidro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is great news +1 On Feb 6, 2008 10:00 AM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 -Deng On Feb 6, 2008 7:06 AM, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Below is the current proposal

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-05 Thread Brett Porter
On 06/02/2008, at 1:20 PM, Napoleon Esmundo C. Ramirez wrote: Just some thoughts, I strongly agree to the proposed technology changes, particularly in the database, as it will definitely improve the storage performance. In line with the objectives to make Continuum a slick CI server, I

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-05 Thread Franz Allan Valencia See
+1 On Feb 5, 2008 6:22 PM, Napoleon Esmundo C. Ramirez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On Feb 6, 2008 10:06 AM, Henry Isidro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is great news +1 On Feb 6, 2008 10:00 AM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 -Deng On Feb 6, 2008 7:06

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-05 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Feb 5, 2008 4:06 PM, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP. Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven PMC to apply for graduation. ... +1 -- Wendy

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-05 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
+1 Arnaud On Feb 6, 2008 12:06 AM, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP. Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven PMC to apply for graduation. [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Emmanuel

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-05 Thread Rahul Thakur
Good to see C2 discussions picking up! \o/ Re. TopLink TopLink Essentials is governed by this license: https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDLv1.0.html I am not sure if that license is compatible with our goals or not. Also, EclipseLink has already been mentioned on this thread earlier.

Re: Some continuum-jpa branch updates

2008-02-05 Thread Rahul Thakur
I would have liked this thread to merge with Continuum 2.0 discussion thread, but anyway... Its seems TopLink can do Criteria Queries (using Expressions and ExpressionBuilders, correct me if I am wrong). It seems quite a few JPA implementations provide some sort of Criteria Query API

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-05 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
LOL. I'm so out of date. I used to work with TopLink way back in the earliest days, and tracked it up to the Oracle buyout. After that I didn't pay attention, and it's clearly changed direction. Never knew the core was open-sourced. Anyway, it's always been one of the better OR/M

Re: Some continuum-jpa branch updates

2008-02-05 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
Nice! On 6-Feb-08, at 00:31 , Rahul Thakur wrote: I would have liked this thread to merge with Continuum 2.0 discussion thread, but anyway... Its seems TopLink can do Criteria Queries (using Expressions and ExpressionBuilders, correct me if I am wrong). It seems quite a few JPA

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-05 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
Incidentally, according to this: http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html CDDL software can be included in binary form (so as a binary maven dependency), but the project would not be able to ship any source from it. regards, Christian. On 6-Feb-08, at 00:03 , Rahul Thakur wrote:

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-05 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 -- Olivier 2008/2/6, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP. Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven PMC to apply for graduation. [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Emmanuel Establish the Apache