Some comments
Database vs xml: definitely database. Throwing away the db access api
(JDO/JPA/...) now that it's already there doesnt make much sense.
Maybe there are implementations that use xml for storage and that's
where you'd need to look if you want file storage
Spring vs Guice vs Plexus:
+1. I was about to query on this + archiva earlier as I saw various
discussions on their dev lists.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Emmanuel Venisse
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 3:07 PM
To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL
+1
Rahul
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Hi,
Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP.
Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven
PMC to apply for graduation.
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Cheers,
Emmanuel
Establish the Apache Continuum Project
WHEREAS, the Board
+1
-Deng
On Feb 6, 2008 7:06 AM, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP.
Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven
PMC to apply for graduation.
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Cheers,
Emmanuel
This is great news +1
On Feb 6, 2008 10:00 AM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
-Deng
On Feb 6, 2008 7:06 AM, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP.
Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal
Just some thoughts,
I strongly agree to the proposed technology changes, particularly in the
database, as it will definitely improve the storage performance. In line
with the objectives to make Continuum a slick CI server, I think the design
changes is a good move as well. In my opinion, having
+1
On Feb 6, 2008 10:06 AM, Henry Isidro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is great news +1
On Feb 6, 2008 10:00 AM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
-Deng
On Feb 6, 2008 7:06 AM, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Below is the current proposal
On 06/02/2008, at 1:20 PM, Napoleon Esmundo C. Ramirez wrote:
Just some thoughts,
I strongly agree to the proposed technology changes, particularly in
the
database, as it will definitely improve the storage performance. In
line
with the objectives to make Continuum a slick CI server, I
+1
On Feb 5, 2008 6:22 PM, Napoleon Esmundo C. Ramirez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Feb 6, 2008 10:06 AM, Henry Isidro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is great news +1
On Feb 6, 2008 10:00 AM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
-Deng
On Feb 6, 2008 7:06
On Feb 5, 2008 4:06 PM, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP.
Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven
PMC to apply for graduation.
...
+1
--
Wendy
+1
Arnaud
On Feb 6, 2008 12:06 AM, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP.
Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven
PMC to apply for graduation.
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Cheers,
Emmanuel
Good to see C2 discussions picking up! \o/
Re. TopLink
TopLink Essentials is governed by this license:
https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDLv1.0.html
I am not sure if that license is compatible with our goals or not. Also,
EclipseLink has already been mentioned on this thread earlier.
I would have liked this thread to merge with Continuum 2.0 discussion
thread, but anyway...
Its seems TopLink can do Criteria Queries (using Expressions and
ExpressionBuilders, correct me if I am wrong). It seems quite a few JPA
implementations provide some sort of Criteria Query API
LOL. I'm so out of date. I used to work with TopLink way back in the
earliest days, and tracked it up to the Oracle buyout. After that I
didn't pay attention, and it's clearly changed direction. Never knew
the core was open-sourced.
Anyway, it's always been one of the better OR/M
Nice!
On 6-Feb-08, at 00:31 , Rahul Thakur wrote:
I would have liked this thread to merge with Continuum 2.0
discussion thread, but anyway...
Its seems TopLink can do Criteria Queries (using Expressions and
ExpressionBuilders, correct me if I am wrong). It seems quite a few
JPA
Incidentally, according to this:
http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
CDDL software can be included in binary form (so as a binary maven
dependency), but the project would not be able to ship any source from
it.
regards,
Christian.
On 6-Feb-08, at 00:03 , Rahul Thakur wrote:
+1
--
Olivier
2008/2/6, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP.
Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven
PMC to apply for graduation.
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Cheers,
Emmanuel
Establish the Apache
17 matches
Mail list logo