Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-06 Thread John Casey
+1 -john On Feb 5, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP. Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven PMC to apply for graduation. [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Emmanuel Establish the Apache

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-06 Thread Dan Fabulich
+1 Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP. Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven PMC to apply for graduation. [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Emmanuel Establish the Apache Continuum Project WHEREAS, the Board of

Re: Some continuum-jpa branch updates

2008-02-06 Thread Damien Lecan
Its seems TopLink can do Criteria Queries (using Expressions and ExpressionBuilders, correct me if I am wrong). It seems quite a few JPA implementations provide some sort of Criteria Query API extension. Hibernate does that too ! Damien

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-06 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Definitely, +1 Congratulations! On Feb 5, 2008 3:06 PM, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP. Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven PMC to apply for graduation. [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-06 Thread Rahul Thakur
Some good points emerging from this discussion! :-) Would it be a nice idea to put following on wiki: 1) State goals/philosophy for C2 in light of lessons learnt from 1.x development - lean, mean, extensible (~add any other here~) 2) Document *all* features/requirements we want to see in C2

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-06 Thread Rahul Thakur
Are you thinking what I am thinking - an OSGi based runtime underneath and plugins/extensions that could be loaded runtime? :-) Carlos Sanchez wrote: Some comments Database vs xml: definitely database. Throwing away the db access api (JDO/JPA/...) now that it's already there doesnt make much

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-06 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, This looks very exciting (I love the plugin idea). As all of this features can be long to implement, I agree with Brett to separate into different millestones releases. (IMHO a full big bang will be very long). And currently they are some blocking issues in the 1.1 release. -- Olivier

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-06 Thread Brett Porter
We can create such a wiki any time - the challenge is converting existing content. If someone is happy to lose history and do it by hand, it can be done straight away. On 06/02/2008, at 9:25 PM, Rahul Thakur wrote: Some good points emerging from this discussion! :-) Would it be a nice

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-06 Thread Vincent Massol
+1 -Vincent On Feb 6, 2008, at 12:06 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP. Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven PMC to apply for graduation. [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Emmanuel Establish the Apache

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-06 Thread Vivek_Nakeesan
+1 ~nakees Emmanuel

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-06 Thread Carlos Sanchez
well, if you want to have a plugin based architecture, what better that OSGi? and it may help too for distributiion of build machines On Feb 6, 2008 2:08 AM, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you thinking what I am thinking - an OSGi based runtime underneath and plugins/extensions that

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-06 Thread Tomasz Pik
On Feb 6, 2008 6:52 AM, Christian Edward Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL. I'm so out of date. I used to work with TopLink way back in the earliest days, and tracked it up to the Oracle buyout. After that I didn't pay attention, and it's clearly changed direction. Never knew the core

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-06 Thread Rahul Thakur
If everyone is happy to keep the history till date on codehaus wiki, I can help copy stuff across to Apache wiki :-) Rahul Brett Porter wrote: We can create such a wiki any time - the challenge is converting existing content. If someone is happy to lose history and do it by hand, it can

XML-RPC Sample Client

2008-02-06 Thread jimmy
I am trying to run the Sample Client, not familiar with Maven or Java for that matter I am having some difficulties. I am able to 'mvn clean install' the entire continuum application from the root and then invoke the webapp and that all runs fine. But how would one invoke the Sample Client for

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-06 Thread Trygve Laugstøl
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP. Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven PMC to apply for graduation. [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 +1 -- Trygve

Fwd: Cayenne and JPA?

2008-02-06 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
LOL. I mixed my lists, as this happened over on Tapestry, but here's the thread. Looks like Cayenne might be an option depending on how far they're going, but it's not there yet, though I have done a bit of open-source work with Andrus (who heads that project) a long time ago, and he's

Re: [vote] Request Graduation to a TLP

2008-02-06 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Vincent 2008/2/5, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Below is the current proposal for the Continuum TLP. Please vote on whether to make this proposal a formal request to the Maven PMC to apply for graduation. [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Cheers, Emmanuel Establish the Apache

Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap

2008-02-06 Thread Edwin Punzalan
I can only agree on the pointers given in the wiki. However, I'd like to reiterate the low significance of database portability in a CI server. I think speed matters but not really portability. Andy seems to be willing to help solve the database problems Continuum is experiencing. Just my 2