Re: [Cooker] some files disapear in php rpms between 8.2 and 9.0/cooker

2002-12-08 Thread Yves Duret
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:02:24PM +0100, Pascal Terjan wrote: > Just a small thing, I think this file should be (I know it is not > packaged currently) in php-pear, not php-devel. yeap i know for the pear files (thus horde2 is completly broken on 9.0). but they are neither on pear rpm (as urpmf

Re: [Cooker] QA Bugzilla questions

2002-12-08 Thread Ben Reser
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 05:45:21PM +0100, Warly wrote: > Yes, you are right, old version should be removed after some time. At > present the version must be 6 months or one year back in the past, I do > not remember exactly, but I could change it to 2 or 3 months. Yeah 2-3 months would be much bet

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Maintainers] REJECTED: flphoto-0.9-0.1mdk.src.rpm rejected

2002-12-08 Thread Ben Reser
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 12:38:36PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > Though apparently everyone who's a "maintainer" got added... but with my > > measly two packages which I can't even remember what they are I somehow > > doubt it's relevent to me... ohh well... > rpmmon is your friend: > rpmmon -

Re: [Cooker] Bugzilla posts absolutely nescessary?

2002-12-08 Thread Ben Reser
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:58:18AM +0100, Warly wrote: > I am still wondering. Look at cooker, 90 % of posts are bug reporting. If all > the bugs go to bugzilla, why then not just remove cooker mailing list ? As > a consequence the very only way to report will be bugzilla. I believe you answered y

[Cooker] Re: ["pam jacpbs" ]

2002-12-08 Thread Gary Lawrence Murphy
> "p" == Pam Jacobs writes: p> gary I have pictures on a disc (not cd) I would like to send p> them to my sister. how do I do this? A very good question ... because (a) it's not obvious and (b) it's one of the things that Mandrake broke with 9.0. I had to turn the "Supermount" feat

Re: [Cooker] MDK vs. Knoppix Auto Detection/Configuration

2002-12-08 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 05:06, Alex Chudnovsky wrote: > On Sunday 08 December 2002 12:38, James Sparenberg wrote: > > On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 01:37, Alex Chudnovsky wrote: > > > I agree completely. What lacks sorely in XFree86, IMHO, is the fallback > > > mechanism - if this driver doesn't work, use an

Re: [Cooker] some files disapear in php rpms between 8.2 and 9.0/cooker

2002-12-08 Thread Pascal Terjan
Yves Duret wrote: It is the Log.php file (and the one under log/), wich is required by horde2. Can we reintroduce back this file (and other related) ? or there is a real reason to have wiped out them ? 08/12 17:26 yves@katu ~% urpmf Log.php php-devel:/usr/lib/php/Log.php phpgroupware:/var/www/ht

[Cooker] some files disapear in php rpms between 8.2 and 9.0/cooker

2002-12-08 Thread Yves Duret
It is the Log.php file (and the one under log/), wich is required by horde2. Can we reintroduce back this file (and other related) ? or there is a real reason to have wiped out them ? 08/12 17:26 yves@katu ~% urpmf Log.php php-devel:/usr/lib/php/Log.php phpgroupware:/var/www/html/phpgroupware/chor

Re: [Cooker] gst-editor

2002-12-08 Thread Götz Waschk
Am Sonntag, 8. Dezember 2002, 03:41:33 Uhr MET, schrieb Steffen Barszus: > I've a 9.0 box. I have added cooker & cooker-contrib as updatemedia and did > then an 'urpmi gst-editor' to install gstreamer and gstreamer-editor. > > This packages urpmi downloaded and installed: > libgnome2_0-2.1.2-1m

Re: [Cooker] MDK vs. Knoppix Auto Detection/Configuration

2002-12-08 Thread Alex Chudnovsky
On Sunday 08 December 2002 12:38, James Sparenberg wrote: > On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 01:37, Alex Chudnovsky wrote: > > I agree completely. What lacks sorely in XFree86, IMHO, is the fallback > > mechanism - if this driver doesn't work, use another driver, and if > > nothing works, use some worst case

[Cooker] man urpmi (french)

2002-12-08 Thread pascal
The french men of urpmi of mdk9.0, need to be update $ man urpmi .. DESCRIPTION .. Pour installer toutes les entrées de menu de tous les paquetages connus, utilisez autoirpm-icons. .. Could I do it? (if I find an uptodate english man ;) Friendly. pascal brognez

[Cooker] [Bug 617] [mozilla] New: mozilla crash with flash plugins

2002-12-08 Thread [Bug 617]
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617 Product: mozilla Component: program Summary: mozilla crash with flash plugins Version: 1.2.1-1mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical

Re: [Cooker] MDK vs. Knoppix Auto Detection/Configuration

2002-12-08 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 01:37, Alex Chudnovsky wrote: > On Sunday 08 December 2002 02:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Pixel, > > > > While I agree with you to a point, newbies won't care WHY Mandrake > > doesn't work with this card well and Knoppix does, only that it doesn't. > > You say that the wa

Re: [Cooker] Bugzilla posts absolutely nescessary?

2002-12-08 Thread Pascal
Le Dimanche 8 Décembre 2002 10:58, Warly a écrit : > Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 05:48:41PM +0100, Warly wrote: > >> OK I will have to investigate on this way. > > > > c) Disallow bug reports on the cooker list. If we allow people to post > > bug reports on th

Re: [Cooker] Bugzilla posts absolutely nescessary?

2002-12-08 Thread Warly
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 05:48:41PM +0100, Warly wrote: >> OK I will have to investigate on this way. > > c) Disallow bug reports on the cooker list. If we allow people to post > bug reports on this list then we're back where we were before. People > end up

Re: [Cooker] MDK vs. Knoppix Auto Detection/Configuration

2002-12-08 Thread Alex Chudnovsky
On Sunday 08 December 2002 02:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Pixel, > > While I agree with you to a point, newbies won't care WHY Mandrake > doesn't work with this card well and Knoppix does, only that it doesn't. > You say that the way Mandrake handles it is better (ie. it uses the SIS > driver, n