[Cooker] 9.0rc1 : Softdrake has no file-tree

2002-09-10 Thread Philip Webb
in the old (somewhat defective) Softdrake in Mandrake 8.2 there was a single display which could be switched between 'install-ed/able'. also, even more useful, the description of each package included a file-tree, which showed very clearly exactly what was installed(-able) where. both of these

Re: [Cooker] 9.0rc1 : Softdrake has no file-tree

2002-09-10 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: in the old (somewhat defective) Softdrake in Mandrake 8.2 there was a single display which could be switched between 'install-ed/able'. IMHO it was bad design. also, even more useful, the description of each package included a file-tree, which showed

Re: [Cooker] 9.0rc1 : Softdrake has no file-tree

2002-09-10 Thread Philip Webb
020910 Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: in the old (somewhat defective) Softdrake in Mandrake 8.2 there was a single display which could be switched between 'install-ed/able'. IMHO it was bad design. well, that's not a reply to anything (smile). also, even

Re: [Cooker] 9.0rc1 : Softdrake has no file-tree

2002-09-10 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 020910 Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: in the old (somewhat defective) Softdrake in Mandrake 8.2 there was a single display which could be switched between 'install-ed/able'. IMHO it was bad design. well, that's