[Cooker] problem with cooker and lilo...

2002-11-28 Thread Thomas Backlund
I have a IBM PC Server 325 wich is an all SCSI system. I installed MDK 9.0 on it and it worked perfect. I then added an Abit HPT370 IDE controller to get support for a 120GB Maxtor IDE disk (cheap storage...) Everything worked fine. Then yesterday I decided to upgrade to latest

Re: [Cooker] problem with cooker and lilo...

2002-11-28 Thread Wesley J Landaker
As a final touch I installed latest kernel with rpm, changed lilo.conf and run 'lilo -v'. no complaints, so I rebooted, and ... :-( the system boots to the point where lilo starts (should start...) I only get an 'L' and then the screen fills up with a number '91' over and over again, and

[Cooker] Problem with Cooker

2001-03-25 Thread Lonely Cat
Hi, all, Just installed cooker from ftp.sunet.se. Quite impressed, but I met some problem as below, 1. Failed to switch back to X If switch to Ctrl+Alt+F1, then no luck to go back with Ctrl+Alt+F7 2. Can't su within X, no problem in console it says 'File size limit exceeded' Any clues?

Re: [Cooker] Problem with Cooker

2001-03-25 Thread Yves Duret
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 07:38:38PM +0200, Lonely Cat wrote: Hi, all, Just installed cooker from ftp.sunet.se. Quite impressed, but I met some problem as below, 1. Failed to switch back to X If switch to Ctrl+Alt+F1, then no luck to go back with Ctrl+Alt+F7 Ctrl+Alt+F8 or F9.. yves

Re: [Cooker] Problem with Cooker

2001-03-25 Thread Lonely Cat
thanks, Yves... F9 works, :) On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Yves Duret wrote: On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 07:38:38PM +0200, Lonely Cat wrote: Hi, all, Just installed cooker from ftp.sunet.se. Quite impressed, but I met some problem as below, 1. Failed to switch back to X If switch to

[Cooker] problem with cooker distribution?

1999-08-31 Thread Paul Duran
Hello all, I have downloaded the cooker distribution and tried to install it, however it was giving a module version conflict with the loop.o module. (2.2.10 for loop.o vs 2.2.11 for kernel version). Are there fixes in progress for this? Is there any 'quick fix' for it? Kind Regards, Paul