Am Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2002 19:22 schrieb Yves Duret:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:10:52AM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Han Boetes wrote on Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 03:30:42AM +0100 :
--=-=-=
Name: esmtp
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:59:11AM +0100, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
So, where is the avantage of this package? Nevertheless you need a
mailserver and postfix is capable of SMTP-AUTH, TLS and many more. And
postfix is known to be stable and secure.
freedom of
Am Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2002 09:30 schrieb Yves Duret:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:59:11AM +0100, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
So, where is the avantage of this package? Nevertheless you need a
mailserver and postfix is capable of SMTP-AUTH, TLS and many more.
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 02:30, Yves Duret wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 08:59:11AM +0100, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
So, where is the avantage of this package? Nevertheless you need a
mailserver and postfix is capable of SMTP-AUTH, TLS and many more. And
Am Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2002 19:22 schrieb Yves Duret:
not queueing mail means no mail written on a hard disk, wich means you
can loose mail with a machine crash..
This package is no more vulnerable to losing mail because of a machine
crash than postfix is. postfix can lose mail if the
Am Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2002 10:04 schrieb Ben Reser:
Am Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2002 19:22 schrieb Yves Duret:
not queueing mail means no mail written on a hard disk, wich means you
can loose mail with a machine crash..
This package is no more vulnerable to losing mail because of a
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:33:03AM +0100, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
To bind to a port less than 1024 you need root privileges. All mailports
are less than 1024. so initialy you need root privileges. OK, you can drop
it once you have bind to port 25 and change to a less privileged user. but
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:33:03AM +0100, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
No, postfix can't lose mail (at least in theory). postfix don't confirms
the receiving of the mail until it is succesfully written to the spool
directory. So you can loose mail if you use write caches in your system
(OS ore
Am Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2002 12:02 schrieb Ben Reser:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:33:03AM +0100, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
To bind to a port less than 1024 you need root privileges. All
mailports are less than 1024. so initialy you need root privileges.
OK, you can drop it once you have
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:58:59PM +0100, Martin Fahrendorf wrote:
Ah, I misinterpretes something. I thought esmtp was also listening. It is
for sending out purpose only, right?
Yup... it's simply a mail injector to accept mail for programs like mutt
that inject mail through the
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:10:52AM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Han Boetes wrote on Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 03:30:42AM +0100 :
--=-=-=
Name: esmtpRelocations: (not relocateable)
* supports the AUTH SMTP extension,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Han Boetes wrote on Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 03:30:42AM +0100 :
--=-=-=
Name: esmtpRelocations: (not relocateable)
* supports the AUTH SMTP extension, with the CRAM-MD5 and NTLM SASL
mechanisms
* support the
Todd Lyons ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Han Boetes wrote on Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 03:30:42AM +0100 :
Name: esmtpRelocations: (not relocateable)
* supports the AUTH SMTP extension, with the CRAM-MD5 and NTLM SASL
mechanisms
* support the StartTLS SMTP
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 08:45:10PM +0100, Han Boetes wrote:
I hope everybody agrees with the fact I made a symlink from the binary
to /usr/sbin/sendmail. I mean that's what makes it easy to use.
Please use alternatives, and provide smtpdaemon and MailTransportAgent.
Do not provide sendmail or
14 matches
Mail list logo
