Re: [Cooker] Still a problem with urpmi and athlon built packages.

2002-09-11 Thread Franois Pons
Kenton Groombridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I hope I did this right. Yes, you did it right. main::(-e:1): 1 DB1 x $a = new URPM 0 URPM=HASH(0x831bef8) 'depslist' = ARRAY(0x831bf4c) empty array 'provides' = HASH(0x831bd84) empty hash DB2 x

Re: [Cooker] Still a problem with urpmi and athlon built packages.

2002-09-11 Thread Franois Pons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes: Kenton Groombridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: main::(-e:1): 1 DB1 x $a = new URPM 0 URPM=HASH(0x831bef8) 'depslist' = ARRAY(0x831bf4c) empty array 'provides' = HASH(0x831bd84) empty hash DB2 x

Re: [Cooker] Still a problem with urpmi and athlon built packages.

2002-09-11 Thread Franois Pons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes: Kenton Groombridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: main::(-e:1): 1 DB1 x $a = new URPM 0 URPM=HASH(0x831bef8) 'depslist' = ARRAY(0x831bf4c) empty array 'provides' =

Re: [Cooker] Still a problem with urpmi and athlon built packages.

2002-09-11 Thread David Walser
--- François Pons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes: Kenton Groombridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: main::(-e:1): 1 DB1 x $a = new URPM 0 URPM=HASH(0x831bef8) 'depslist' = ARRAY(0x831bf4c) empty array 'provides' =

Re: [Cooker] Still a problem with urpmi and athlon built packages.

2002-09-10 Thread Franois Pons
Kenton Groombridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, There is still a problem with packages built with --target athlon. urpmi doesn't show them as being installed although they are. Here is the output of urpmi libjs (I rebuilt mozilla with --target athlon): [root@buttercup linux]# urpmi

Re: [Cooker] Still a problem with urpmi and athlon built packages.

2002-09-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 02:49, allen wrote: Please allow me to ask... What packages are a good idea to rebuild with --target athlon ? Makes a big difference somewhere in particular ? BTW, GCC 3.2 added a target specifically for Athlon XPs, so if you have one of them, use athlon-xp . Does

Re: [Cooker] Still a problem with urpmi and athlon built packages.

2002-09-10 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kenton Groombridge wrote: | I have to rebuild mozilla with gcc 3.2 so java will work. While I do it | I might as well build it for my athlon platform. I don't do it for a | speed increase, I just rebuild them when I have to. Ummm, that's going to

Re: [Cooker] Still a problem with urpmi and athlon built packages.

2002-09-10 Thread Vox
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 02:49, allen wrote: Please allow me to ask... What packages are a good idea to rebuild with --target athlon ? Makes a big difference somewhere in particular ? BTW, GCC 3.2 added a target specifically for Athlon

Re: [Cooker] Still a problem with urpmi and athlon built packages.

2002-09-10 Thread Kenton Groombridge
I built java with gcc 3.2. The way I look at it, gcc 3.2 is the new standard and everything older should be dumped. One of the reasons I like Linux is that it moves on. I posted a message earlier on cooker stating my opinion that they ought to post mozilla compiled with gcc 3.2. I think

Re: [Cooker] Still a problem with urpmi and athlon built packages.

2002-09-10 Thread Kenton Groombridge
I hope I did this right. Thanks, Ken main::(-e:1): 1 DB1 x $a = new URPM 0 URPM=HASH(0x831bef8) 'depslist' = ARRAY(0x831bf4c) empty array 'provides' = HASH(0x831bd84) empty hash DB2 x $a-parse_rpm(libjs-1.1-8mdk.athlon.rpm); 0 0 1 0 DB3 x

[Cooker] Still a problem with urpmi and athlon built packages.

2002-09-09 Thread Kenton Groombridge
Hi, There is still a problem with packages built with --target athlon. urpmi doesn't show them as being installed although they are. Here is the output of urpmi libjs (I rebuilt mozilla with --target athlon): [root@buttercup linux]# urpmi libjs % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed

Re: [Cooker] Still a problem with urpmi and athlon built packages.

2002-09-09 Thread allen
Please allow me to ask... What packages are a good idea to rebuild with --target athlon ? Makes a big difference somewhere in particular ? -AEF