Ben Reser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 08:50:07PM -0500, Simon Ree wrote:
[root@localhost tmp]# urpmi wireless-tools-25-3mdk.i586.rpm
The following packages have bad signatures:
wireless-tools-25-3mdk.i586.rpm
Do you want to continue installation ? (y/N) y
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:08:23PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
Was this regarding an account with rights to upload to contrib? Did you
follow it up?
And a number of people who put up those other pages are starting to
contribute to cooker/MandrakeClub, so that their packages are useful to
Ben Reser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:08:23PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
Was this regarding an account with rights to upload to contrib? Did you
follow it up?
And a number of people who put up those other pages are starting to
contribute to
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 08:01:23PM -0500, Simon Ree wrote:
Thanks for packaging bbpager, much appreciated. Did not know that you
had updated wireless-tools. Does not work for me, maybe that is why
it is not up yet. Here is my attempt.
[root@localhost tmp]# rpm -q wireless-tools
Ben Reser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 08:01:23PM -0500, Simon Ree wrote:
Thanks for packaging bbpager, much appreciated. Did not know that you
had updated wireless-tools. Does not work for me, maybe that is why
it is not up yet. Here is my attempt.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 08:50:07PM -0500, Simon Ree wrote:
[root@localhost tmp]# urpmi wireless-tools-25-3mdk.i586.rpm
The following packages have bad signatures:
wireless-tools-25-3mdk.i586.rpm
Do you want to continue installation ? (y/N) y
installing wireless-tools-25-3mdk.i586.rpm
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 10:56:46AM +, Adam Williamson wrote:
As the originaly poster said, to be fair to pornview it does look like a
lot more useful program than hotbabe was (though it's a shame it's
GTK1.2, not GTK2). To my knowledge there isn't a decent slideshow viewer
with a modern
On Sunday 01 December 2002 03:12 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Mike Graham wrote:
On Saturday 30 November 2002 06:00 pm, Adam Williamson wrote:
The RPM for pornview is already on Texstars website Pclinuxonline.com
Tex (unlike almost all other contributors and builders of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Texstar wrote:
| uh right Ranger, unless you packaged pornview 0.1.0 within 30 minutes
after it
| was announced on freshmeat then no you didnt package it before me. But it
| doesn't matter since my stuff doesn't count.
Yeah, but the problem is
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Texstar wrote:
On the other hand, if you cooperated a bit more, you could fit well with
the distribution like PLF and JPackage do now, but maybe you don't care
if your RPMS integrate well or not. This sounds like your personal
project you don't want to share. It's
Can you watch .WMV files with it?
it uses xine-lib... so if xine supports it I guess it could work.
Stefan van der Eijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
While the famous Microsoft True Type Fonts for Contrib... thread has
died down a bit, I've got the following question.
I've found some
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Mike Graham wrote:
On Saturday 30 November 2002 06:00 pm, Adam Williamson wrote:
The RPM for pornview is already on Texstars website Pclinuxonline.com
Tex (unlike almost all other contributors and builders of RPMS) doesn't
cooperate with any other projects, he duplicates
texstar does have a slightly cleaned up rpm of it for 9.0
James
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 21:47, Han Boetes wrote:
Can you watch .WMV files with it?
Stefan van der Eijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
While the famous Microsoft True Type Fonts for Contrib... thread has
died down a bit, I've got
On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 05:14, nDiScReEt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 30 November 2002 8:44 pm, Michael Scherer wrote:
It looks like a useful program. If we can have a package called BitchX, I
don't know why we can't have pornview. Just my $ .02.
I
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 10:56:46AM +, Adam Williamson wrote:
As the originaly poster said, to be fair to pornview it does look like a
lot more useful program than hotbabe was (though it's a shame it's
GTK1.2, not GTK2). To my knowledge there isn't a decent slideshow viewer
with a modern
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Ben Reser wrote:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 10:56:46AM +, Adam Williamson wrote:
As the originaly poster said, to be fair to pornview it does look like a
lot more useful program than hotbabe was (though it's a shame it's
GTK1.2, not GTK2). To my knowledge there isn't a
On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 11:51, Buchan Milne wrote:
I think the author should be contacted, since he's going to have problems
with any other distro including it, it would be much better (and less
package maintenance work) to get it upstreamed.
I just emailed him asking if he'd be willing to do
--- Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Ben Reser wrote:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 10:56:46AM +, Adam
Williamson wrote:
As the originaly poster said, to be fair to
pornview it does look like a
lot more useful program than hotbabe was (though
it's a shame it's
Le Dimanche 1 Décembre 2002 02:05, David Walser a écrit :
Was that the hot-babe CPU monitor? Heh, that wasn't
even real, just artwork. I wonder what ever happened
with that. I submitted a patch to the author and some
images for the menu entry to the PLF packager and
never heard back from
Sweet, thanks Guillaume. Now I just have to check the
website to see if the author did anything with my
patch. I remember looking at 0.1.2 and it'd be a bit
of work to integrate it due to the changes in that
version (not all of which made sense I thought).
You know, we could have it back in
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 01:51:29PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
ee, kview
They play videos also?? This is one of the few apps I know of that can
handle all media well. gqview (while gtk1.2) and gthumb are ok for images,
but we need a generic media viewing tool.
Nope just pictures. But
021201 Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 10:56:46AM +, Adam Williamson wrote:
pornview does look like a lot more useful program than hotbabe was
To my knowledge there isn't a decent slideshow viewer
with a modern interface in MDK at all,
so it'd be nice to get something like
While the famous Microsoft True Type Fonts for Contrib... thread has
died down a bit, I've got the following question.
I've found some software called pornview (great name!) --
http://pornview.sourceforge.net/ . I've packaged it and am now wondering
if it's OK to upload it to contrib or if it
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 22:55, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
While the famous Microsoft True Type Fonts for Contrib... thread has
died down a bit, I've got the following question.
I've found some software called pornview (great name!) --
http://pornview.sourceforge.net/ . I've packaged it and
On Saturday 30 November 2002 06:00 pm, Adam Williamson wrote:
The RPM for pornview is already on Texstars website Pclinuxonline.com
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 22:55, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
While the famous Microsoft True Type Fonts for Contrib... thread has
died down a bit, I've got the
Was that the hot-babe CPU monitor? Heh, that wasn't
even real, just artwork. I wonder what ever happened
with that. I submitted a patch to the author and some
images for the menu entry to the PLF packager and
never heard back from either. Haven't checked the
site or PLF, guess I will sometime.
Besides the 18+ issue, there may be copyright issues
on the pictures in there. It would be OK for contrib
if you made a patch to replace those images. There
were some copyrighted images in Tuxkart and I did the
same thing with that, just created some new images
cobbled together from stuff I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 30 November 2002 5:23 pm, Mike Graham wrote:
On Saturday 30 November 2002 06:00 pm, Adam Williamson wrote:
The RPM for pornview is already on Texstars website Pclinuxonline.com
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 22:55, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
It looks like a useful program. If we can have a package called BitchX, I
don't know why we can't have pornview. Just my $ .02.
I think because of this picture :
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/pornview/pornview/src/pixmaps/logo.png?rev=1.1.1.1
This is the logo.
Mick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 30 November 2002 8:44 pm, Michael Scherer wrote:
It looks like a useful program. If we can have a package called BitchX, I
don't know why we can't have pornview. Just my $ .02.
I think because of this picture :
Can you watch .WMV files with it?
Stefan van der Eijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
While the famous Microsoft True Type Fonts for Contrib... thread has
died down a bit, I've got the following question.
I've found some software called pornview (great name!) --
31 matches
Mail list logo
