http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2003/006489/openssl.htm
--
adamw
Am Mittwoch, 1. Oktober 2003, 12:29:37 Uhr MET, schrieb Adam Williamson:
http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2003/006489/openssl.htm
Do you mean this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] upload]$ rpm -q openssl
openssl-0.9.7b-4.1.92mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] upload]$ rpm -q --changelog openssl|head
* Mi Okt 01 2003
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 12:34, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 1. Oktober 2003, 12:29:37 Uhr MET, schrieb Adam Williamson:
http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2003/006489/openssl.htm
Do you mean this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] upload]$ rpm -q openssl
openssl-0.9.7b-4.1.92mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] upload]$
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 12:34, Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 1. Oktober 2003, 12:29:37 Uhr MET, schrieb Adam Williamson:
http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2003/006489/openssl.htm
Do you mean this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] upload]$
The advisory was out 6 hours before you posted ... maybe you should
subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
Nah, I'm not really massively interested in security - I just saw the
vulnerability report and no Mandrake advisory when I was reading the
daily news, so I figured I'd mention it.
--
adamw
On Wed Oct 01, 2003 at 12:41:51PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2003/006489/openssl.htm
Do you mean this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] upload]$ rpm -q openssl
openssl-0.9.7b-4.1.92mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] upload]$ rpm -q --changelog openssl|head
* Mi Okt 01 2003
onsdagen den 1 oktober 2003 18.13 skrev Vincent Danen:
On Wed Oct 01, 2003 at 12:41:51PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2003/006489/openssl.htm
Do you mean this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] upload]$ rpm -q openssl
openssl-0.9.7b-4.1.92mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed Oct 01, 2003 at 06:45:42PM +0200, Oden Eriksson wrote:
http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2003/006489/openssl.htm
Do you mean this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] upload]$ rpm -q openssl
openssl-0.9.7b-4.1.92mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] upload]$ rpm -q --changelog openssl|head
* Mi