I believe that one method for getting money would be by selling some
other stuff like t-shirts with stylish Mandrake linux logo.
If there would be t-shirts in the mandrake store I would definitively
buy two or three...
Mika
Leon Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:17, Stefan van der Eijk
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:17, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Instead of complaining on how not to generate cash, could we perhaps
focus on finding an acceptable way for the $$$ to flow into mdk. We
(contributors) will also benefit from it.
Agree. And the proposed approach is about as unobtrusive as
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:50, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
if this advertized Mandrake was the first i try to install,
i would probably never try it again, and probably never go for a
boxed version.
i still disslike SuSE, because they use closed installer,
and there are no free install CD, and i
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:09, Luca Berra wrote:
You are right, my personal feeling is that an adware version of
mandrake will have the effect of enraging many people from the linux
community.
I can't remember which program it was, since this was so long ago, but
there was a product which
Han Boetes wrote:
Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody whos name is lost wrote:
i know, and i have the same opinion as you,
but what can we do ?-(
How about: help Mandrakesoft come up with a better way to generate revenue?
Hear hear,
Howbout an uitzendbureau?
On Saturday 13 September 2003 03:54, Vincent Danen wrote:
I've had it with all this whining. Back to doing something constructive.
Hear hear!
--
Magnus Pedersen
On Sat Sep 13, 2003 at 01:26:08AM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
[...]
You know what? I hate to shatter your ego and I'm sure I'll get
floode
d
with hate mail but... cooker is *not* MandrakeSoft. Yes we value your
input, yes we value your contributions, yes we value
So what's made Mandrake not open? The fact that there will be one
ad in the
installer or the fact that I spoke?
the installer is just a step, like the bookmarks, the question is
what will follow
well, the same kind of reproch were made to the club, and now what ?
well nothing special
Le Samedi 13 Septembre 2003 05:24, Brant Fitzsimmons a écrit :
Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Fri Sep 12 21:41 -0400, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/wimbledon_2003/photo_galleries/3038554.stm
2nd picture.
And Rolex in the 3rd.
And FILA on the tee-shirt: pictures 6th
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 02:44, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
No, but it would at least act as a disincentive by being a hostage to
fortune; if they broke it, the reaction would be all the greater because
there would be something concrete to point to and say look, you said
this and you lied. This
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 03:46, Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Fri Sep 12 21:41 -0400, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/wimbledon_2003/photo_galleries/3038554.stm
2nd picture.
Oh, right, on the speedometer. I thought the meant the back wall itself.
Well, I guess the
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 11:26, Michael Scherer wrote:
and everything in a timeframe of 8 h. Given the fact that mandrake
direction does not read slashdot every minutes, this is acceptable.
In fact, mandrake listened to their complaints. And this is good.
It's not acceptable at all. You seem to
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 12:29, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 11:26, Michael Scherer wrote:
and everything in a timeframe of 8 h. Given the fact that mandrake
direction does not read slashdot every minutes, this is acceptable.
In fact, mandrake listened to their complaints.
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 03:46, Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Fri Sep 12 21:41 -0400, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/wimbledon_2003/photo_galleries/3038554.stm
2nd picture.
Oh, right, on the speedometer. I thought the
On Fri 12 Sep 2003 03:25, Götz Waschk posted as excerpted below:
Am Freitag, 12. September 2003, 03:15:18 Uhr MET, schrieb Duncan:
On Thu 11 Sep 2003 23:50, Svetoslav Slavtchev posted as excerpted below:
i still disslike SuSE, because they use closed installer,
and there are no free
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 13:38, Buchan Milne wrote:
So, it's better to have a public policy on advertising, and break it, than
to not have one?
Pragmatically, yes. As I said, the fact that there's a known policy
limits their possibilities; all they can do is bend the rules. Breaking
them
On Fri 12 Sep 2003 09:12, Jan Ciger posted as excerpted below:
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
| sound almost great :(
| like in the famous linux browser opera (not that i like it or use it),
| but
|
| well if you want it for free, you'll have to see some adds,
| but go and get the full version
MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Corporate branded distros? What if a company like HP wanted to brand the
MDK distro for distribution on their hardware. Is there a financial
opportunity there to charge?
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/oem/hardwarepart/hp/details
--
Jan Ciger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
b) nobody even bothered to say something to people in Cooker. There are
plenty of people there, who are spending lots of time working on Cooker
without any remuneration. People here are not even worth a mail from MDK
saying something like oh, btw, there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
| I hate to say that, but I agree. But I let you also know that we
| also have internal communications problems, and I also learnt
| from linuxfr.org the presence of the mandrake page with the price
| of ads :/.
Wow, if even
Ainsi parlait Jan Ciger :
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
| I hate to say that, but I agree. But I let you also know that we
| also have internal communications problems, and I also learnt
| from linuxfr.org the presence of the mandrake page with the price
| of ads :/.
Wow, if even
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 21:08, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
I can't say I enjoy the situation, but I find whining every time this is
clearly demonstrated a bit... naïve ?
The whining isn't - or at least isn't purely - self-interested. The
point is that better communication would be squarely in the
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 02:47, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
no.
I'm all for it. I replace the screensaver and bookmarks straight away
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 02:47, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
no.
I'm all for it. I replace the screensaver and
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:17:45AM +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Interesting. People on this list seem only mention how *not* to generate
cash.
This product is being developed by a company, i.e bills, salaries and
taxes need to be paid.
You are right, my personal feeling is that an adware
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:17:45AM +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Interesting. People on this list seem only mention how *not* to generate
cash.
This product is being developed by a company, i.e bills, salaries and
taxes need to be paid.
You are right, my personal feeling is that an adware
On Thu 11 Sep 2003 23:50, Svetoslav Slavtchev posted as excerpted below:
i still disslike SuSE, because they use closed installer,
and there are no free install CD, and i think i would have
similer impression from Mandrake.
The free install CD may be a valid point, but the installer.. well,
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 07:17, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
My point wasn't really about whether it affected us directly. Obviously
it won't - given that we use Cooker, I don't know if we'll even ever
*see* the offending adverts. The point is I think it's a horrible way of
generating revenue
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 09:53, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:17:45AM +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Interesting. People on this list seem only mention how *not* to generate
cash.
This product is being developed by a company, i.e bills, salaries and
taxes need to be
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 09:53, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:17:45AM +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
Interesting. People on this list seem only mention how *not* to
generate
cash.
This product is being developed by a company, i.e bills, salaries and
taxes need to
Am Fri, 12 Sep 2003 01:20:05 + schrieb Adam Williamson:
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
...
no.
I don't understand some peoples negative attitude towards advertizements.
A couple of month ago my company (a small OSS startup) has decided to
become a mdk partner for
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 12:47, Udo Rader wrote:
Am Fri, 12 Sep 2003 01:20:05 + schrieb Adam Williamson:
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
...
no.
I don't understand some peoples negative attitude towards advertizements.
A couple of month ago my company (a small
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Williamson wrote:
| On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 07:17, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
| Charge more, sell books, make the Club better, go busking on the streets
| of Paris...anything but adverts. ADVERTS. guh.
Yes, probably nothing is more annoying than
Am Freitag, 12. September 2003, 03:15:18 Uhr MET, schrieb Duncan:
On Thu 11 Sep 2003 23:50, Svetoslav Slavtchev posted as excerpted below:
i still disslike SuSE, because they use closed installer,
and there are no free install CD, and i think i would have
similer impression from Mandrake.
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 02:47, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
no.
I'm all for it. I replace the screensaver and bookmarks straight away
anyway, and it's a simple way to
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 15:13, Rolf Pedersen wrote:
How are ads unprofessional? They might be an unpleasant reminder of
the stark reality that some must pay for what so many take for free.
Perhaps, if more downloaders (especially those enjoying the apparent
wherewithal to run a laptop *and*
On Fri Sep 12 8:50 +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
sorry for the missunderstanding, i completely agree.
if this advertized Mandrake was the first i try to install,
i would probably never try it again, and probably never go for a boxed
version.
i still disslike SuSE, because they use
On Fri Sep 12 12:55 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
I also absolute hate the fact that the way this is being implemented
sets a precedent for the impairment of the actual functionality of the
OS through adverts, which is the effect of putting adverts on the
default home page and on the browser
On Fri Sep 12 8:50 +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
sorry for the missunderstanding, i completely agree.
if this advertized Mandrake was the first i try to install,
i would probably never try it again, and probably never go for a boxed
version.
i still disslike SuSE, because
Am Freitag, 12. September 2003, 03:15:18 Uhr MET, schrieb Duncan:
On Thu 11 Sep 2003 23:50, Svetoslav Slavtchev posted as excerpted below:
i still disslike SuSE, because they use closed installer,
and there are no free install CD, and i think i would have
similer impression from
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 12:47, Udo Rader wrote:
Am Fri, 12 Sep 2003 01:20:05 + schrieb Adam Williamson:
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
...
no.
I don't understand some peoples negative attitude towards advertizements.
A couple of month
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 06:26, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 07:17, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
My point wasn't really about whether it affected us directly. Obviously
it won't - given that we use Cooker, I don't know if we'll even ever
*see* the offending adverts. The point
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Slashdot has this on it's frontpage already. Great way how to announce
something
like this, Mandrake :-(
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/09/12/1315224mode=nestedtid=126tid=147tid=163tid=187tid=98tid=99
Jan
- --
Jan Ciger
VRlab EPFL Switzerland
Quoting Brant Fitzsimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 12:47, Udo Rader wrote:
Am Fri, 12 Sep 2003 01:20:05 + schrieb Adam Williamson:
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
...
no.
I don't understand some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Slashdot has this on it's frontpage already. Great way how to announce
something
like this, Mandrake :-(
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/09/12/1315224mode=nestedtid=126tid=147tid=163tid=187tid=98tid=99
Jan
sound almost great :(
like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
| sound almost great :(
| like in the famous linux browser opera (not that i like it or use it), but
|
| well if you want it for free, you'll have to see some adds,
| but go and get the full version -- noads, cheap
That's
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] um.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Slashdot has this on it's frontpage already. Great way how
to announce
something
like this, Mandrake :-(
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/09/12/1315224mode=neste
dtid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
| sound almost great :(
| like in the famous linux browser opera (not that i like it or use it),
but
|
| well if you want it for free, you'll have to see some adds,
| but go and get the full version -- noads, cheap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
| Corporate branded distros? What if a company like HP wanted to brand the
| MDK distro for distribution on their hardware. Is there a financial
| opportunity there to charge?
|
| Cory
|
If HP want's to brand the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
| i know, and i have the same opinion as you,
| but what can we do ?-(
Maybe let Madrakians publicly know what we think about this move ? IMHO
it is a suicidal move for them, because MDK is not *that much* better
than other
i know, and i have the same opinion as you,
but what can we do ?-(
How about: help Mandrakesoft come up with a better way to generate revenue?
Stefan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Fri Sep 12 18:57 +0200, Jan Ciger wrote:
MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
| Corporate branded distros? What if a company like HP wanted to brand the
| MDK distro for distribution on their hardware. Is there a financial
| opportunity there to charge?
|
| Cory
|
If HP want's to
On Fri Sep 12 18:57 +0200, Jan Ciger wrote:
If HP want's to brand the distro, they can already.
Mandrake also offers, for a fee (and has for a looong time), to create a
branded distribution for large customers/OEMs. I wouldn't be surprised
if the version of MDK that HP is distributing is
Quoting Jan Ciger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
| i know, and i have the same opinion as you,
| but what can we do ?-(
Maybe let Madrakians publicly know what we think about this move ? IMHO
it is a suicidal move for them,
On Friday 12 September 2003 09:13 am, Rolf Pedersen wrote:
My point wasn't really about whether it affected us directly.
Obviously it won't - given that we use Cooker, I don't know if
we'll even ever *see* the offending adverts. The point is I think
it's a horrible way of generating
---Original Message-
--From: Svetoslav Slavtchev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 12:32 PM
--To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--Subject: Re: [Cooker] um.
--Importance: Low
--
--
-- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
-- Hash: SHA1
--
-- Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote
On Fri Sep 12, 2003 at 03:02:49AM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
no.
I'm all for it. I replace the screensaver and bookmarks straight away
anyway, and it's a simple way to fund your favourite distro. It's not
as if
a PR perspective, this will have a negative
impact.
Cory
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Danen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 11:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] um.
On Fri Sep 12, 2003 at 03:02:49AM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/mdkads.php3
I think your concerns are unfounded, and I also think you're being a little
silly. Do you close your eyes when you're driving around and see billboards
that advertise stuff? Do you close your eyes and mute the TV when the
commercials are on? Do you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Vincent Danen wrote:
| I hate to say it, but it cracks me up how people are so against
advertising,
| our business model, and things we do to make revenue so that the
developers
| and others in the company can eat and afford to spend all of
I think this may help:
http://www1.mandrakelinux.com/en/mdkads.php3
it clears up some misconceptions and definitely eases my mind regarding the
situation.
I think the problem is that when you say Ad people think of the most common
example: spam or popups. Those are very intrusive and
---Original Message-
--From: Vincent Danen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 2:35 PM
--To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--Subject: Re: [Cooker] um.
--
--
--On Fri Sep 12, 2003 at 03:02:49AM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
--
--http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, breaking my own wow not to reply to this thread anymore, *sic*.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I think this may help:
|
| http://www1.mandrakelinux.com/en/mdkads.php3
|
| it clears up some misconceptions and definitely eases my mind
regarding the
|
On Fri Sep 12, 2003 at 09:22:15PM +0200, Jan Ciger wrote:
(Ok, I lied, but I had to respond to this post because it's just infuriating
and insulting).
| I hate to say it, but it cracks me up how people are so against
advertising,
| our business model, and things we do to make revenue so that
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 15:49, Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Fri Sep 12 12:55 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
I also absolute hate the fact that the way this is being implemented
sets a precedent for the impairment of the actual functionality of the
OS through adverts, which is the effect of putting
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 16:36, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Do you ever watch sports? Take the US Open that just wrapped up last
weekend.
Yeah. But for the tennis, I far prefer watching Wimbledon. They don't
take adverts.
--
adamw
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 17:57, Jan Ciger wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
| Corporate branded distros? What if a company like HP wanted to brand the
| MDK distro for distribution on their hardware. Is there a financial
| opportunity
On Fri Sep 12 22:45 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 17:57, Jan Ciger wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
| Corporate branded distros? What if a company like HP wanted to brand the
| MDK distro for distribution
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 19:34, Vincent Danen wrote:
I think your concerns are unfounded, and I also think you're being a little
silly. Do you close your eyes when you're driving around and see billboards
that advertise stuff? Do you close your eyes and mute the TV when the
I don't drive.
On Fri Sep 12 22:33 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 15:49, Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Fri Sep 12 12:55 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
I also absolute hate the fact that the way this is being implemented
sets a precedent for the impairment of the actual functionality of the
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 16:36, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Do you ever watch sports? Take the US Open that just wrapped up last
weekend.
Yeah. But for the tennis, I far prefer watching Wimbledon. They don't
take adverts.
Someone should tell their sponsors then.
On Friday 12 September 2003 22:07, Jan Ciger wrote:
Ok, breaking my own wow not to reply to this thread anymore, *sic*.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I think this may help:
|
| http://www1.mandrakelinux.com/en/mdkads.php3
|
| it clears up some misconceptions and definitely eases my mind
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Scherer wrote:
|Thanks for pointing it out, it does clear up the issues. But why this
|page had to appear only after the uproar erupted ?
|
| We will never know, but i am sure that mandrake did nothing to actively
| show this to the world,
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 22:53, Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Fri Sep 12 22:45 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 17:57, Jan Ciger wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
| Corporate branded distros? What if a company like
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 23:18, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 16:36, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Do you ever watch sports? Take the US Open that just wrapped up last
weekend.
Yeah. But for the tennis, I far prefer watching Wimbledon. They
On Fri Sep 12, 2003 at 09:22:15PM +0200, Jan Ciger wrote:
(Ok, I lied, but I had to respond to this post because it's just
infuriating
and insulting).
| I hate to say it, but it cracks me up how people are so against
advertising,
| our business model, and things we do to make
..
It's exactly the same mechanism.
Put a few different pngs in /Mandrake/share/advertising/ and voila,
you've branded the installer.
Put a few different pngs in /usr/share/mdk/xscreensaver/ and voila,
you've branded the screensaver.
All Mandrake is doing is allowing people/companies
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 00:37, Kye Lewis wrote:
..
It's exactly the same mechanism.
Put a few different pngs in /Mandrake/share/advertising/ and voila,
you've branded the installer.
Put a few different pngs in /usr/share/mdk/xscreensaver/ and voila,
you've branded the screensaver.
...
All Mandrake is doing is allowing people/companies to participate in
the
default branding of the distribution.
This being the case, would it not be simply a matter of installing a
different RPM to get rid of it all?
I have no problem with the installer ads, i'll survive through
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 23:18, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 16:36, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Do you ever watch sports? Take the US Open that just wrapped up last
weekend.
Yeah. But for the tennis, I far
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 00:59, Kye Lewis wrote:
Well, I think if you're reassured by the page you're taking something of
a short term view. What the case is for 9.2 isn't massively important to
me, I want to see Mandrakesoft place some kind of definite boundaries on
the strategy to cover
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 01:05, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Was IBM on that list? It sure was. What does the banner ad in the
upper right hand corner of the site say?
What? I'm talking about the event here, which is what you were talking
about in the first place. What's the website got to do with
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 01:05, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Was IBM on that list? It sure was. What does the banner ad in the
upper right hand corner of the site say?
What? I'm talking about the event here, which is what you were talking
about in the first place.
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 01:44, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 01:05, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Was IBM on that list? It sure was. What does the banner ad in the
upper right hand corner of the site say?
What? I'm talking about the
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 23:18, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 16:36, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Do you ever watch sports? Take the US Open that just wrapped up last
weekend.
Yeah. But for the
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 01:56, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 23:18, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 16:36, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Do you ever watch sports? Take the US Open that
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 01:44, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 01:05, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Was IBM on that list? It sure was. What does the banner ad in the
upper right hand corner of the site say?
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 01:56, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 23:18, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 16:36, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Do you ever
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 00:59, Kye Lewis wrote:
Well, I think if you're reassured by the page you're taking something of
a short term view. What the case is for 9.2 isn't massively important to
me, I want to see Mandrakesoft place some kind of definite boundaries on
the
On Sat Sep 13, 2003 at 01:26:08AM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
[...]
You know what? I hate to shatter your ego and I'm sure I'll get flooded
with hate mail but... cooker is *not* MandrakeSoft. Yes we value your
input, yes we value your contributions, yes we value your support, and
On Fri Sep 12 21:41 -0400, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/wimbledon_2003/photo_galleries/3038554.stm
2nd picture.
--
Levi Ramsey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take due notice and govern yourselves accordingly.
Currently playing:
Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Fri Sep 12 21:41 -0400, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/wimbledon_2003/photo_galleries/3038554.stm
2nd picture.
And Rolex in the 3rd.
--
Brant Fitzsimmons
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
...
no.
--
adamw
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 02:42, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
no.
I'm all for it. I replace the screensaver and bookmarks straight away
anyway, and it's a simple way to fund your favourite distro. It's
On Thursday 11 September 2003 08:42 pm, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
no.
I'm all for it. I replace the screensaver and bookmarks straight
away anyway, and it's a simple way to fund your favourite
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
no.
I'm all for it. I replace the screensaver and bookmarks straight away
anyway, and it's a simple way to fund your favourite distro. It's not
as if we're seeing in-yer-face
On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 02:47, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/partners/advertising
no.
I'm all for it. I replace the screensaver and bookmarks straight away
anyway, and it's a simple way to fund your
97 matches
Mail list logo
