Le Jeudi 3 Octobre 2002 22:37, Buchan Milne a écrit :
On 3 Oct 2002, Frederic Soulier wrote:
[...]
P.S. There will probably be an update for samba in the works, for other
reasons ...
I suggest we wait for the upcoming 2.2.6 release (should be anytime now) and
try again.
Regards, Sly
--
On Thursday 03 October 2002 02:37 pm, Frederic Soulier wrote:
testparm returns no error plus this is the same config I used on 8.2 :)
Although I'm not having your problem as I dont run winbind, my custom tuned
smb.conf that worked even up to rc2 no longer works also. Very starange
indeed. I
Brook Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 03 October 2002 02:37 pm, Frederic Soulier wrote:
testparm returns no error plus this is the same config I used on 8.2 :)
Although I'm not having your problem as I dont run winbind
It wasn't winbind, it was wins
, my custom tuned
smb.conf that
On Friday 04 October 2002 07:44 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
Brook Humphrey wrote:
Although I'm not having your problem as I dont run winbind
It wasn't winbind, it was wins
Sorry like I said I don't use it so I got the name wrong.
smb.conf that worked even up to rc2 no longer works
Brook Humphrey wrote:
On Friday 04 October 2002 07:44 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
smb.conf that worked even up to rc2 no longer works also.
Please define 'no longer works'
Well the users can see the shares but not access them. I call that not
working. I have it set up to allow anonymous
On Friday 04 October 2002 08:51 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
I was unaware that there were no changes between rc2 and final but something
has changed not sure what. This could make thing much harder to work out.
Thanks for the help on the default smb.conf but I will attach my real one so
you can
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Brook Humphrey wrote:
Is there any other besides vim? Well I use gvim but they use the same
back-end.
kate (which was my first suggestion) works fine for me, suiteable if you
use KDE, you can even edit smb.conf files remotely with kio_fish ;-).
and
$ man smb.conf
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 23:08, Todd Lyons wrote:
Todd Lyons wrote on Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 01:57:02PM -0700 :
Frederic Soulier wrote on Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:52:39PM +0100 :
Why is nmbd started twice?
Because a couple name lookups came in between the time that you started
it
On 3 Oct 2002, Frederic Soulier wrote:
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 23:08, Todd Lyons wrote:
Todd Lyons wrote on Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 01:57:02PM -0700 :
Frederic Soulier wrote on Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:52:39PM +0100 :
Why is nmbd started twice?
I'm such a dummy sometimes. You
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 21:37, Buchan Milne wrote:
On 3 Oct 2002, Frederic Soulier wrote:
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 23:08, Todd Lyons wrote:
Todd Lyons wrote on Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 01:57:02PM -0700 :
Frederic Soulier wrote on Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:52:39PM +0100 :
Why is nmbd
Frederic Soulier wrote on Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 06:06:09PM +0100 :
# ps aux
shows 1 smbd -D process and 2 nmbd -D processes.
If you actually login about 20 people to the Samba server, you'll see 20
smbd processes.
Why is nmbd started twice?
Because a couple name lookups came in between the
Frederic Soulier wrote on Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:52:39PM +0100 :
Why is nmbd started twice?
Because a couple name lookups came in between the time that you started
it and the time that you did ps ax.
There is only one machine on this network... I doubt there's been a name
lookup ;)
Todd Lyons wrote on Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 01:57:02PM -0700 :
Frederic Soulier wrote on Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:52:39PM +0100 :
Why is nmbd started twice?
Because a couple name lookups came in between the time that you started
it and the time that you did ps ax.
There is only one
13 matches
Mail list logo
