> On 7 Feb 2022, at 14:09, Shane Kerr wrote:
>
> Desiree,
>
> Thank you for this proposal!
And thank you for the questions, thoughts and comments Shane.
My brief answers, questions bellow.
> On 03/02/2022 20.16, Desiree Miloshevic wrote:
>> We’d like to know if there is some support from
Desiree,
Thank you for this proposal!
On 03/02/2022 20.16, Desiree Miloshevic wrote:
We’d like to know if there is some support from members for having a
RIPE community response on this proposal?
I think that a RIPE community response makes sense.
We would really appreciate your feedback
half of Olivier MJ
Crépin-Leblond
Date: Saturday, 5 February 2022 at 20:51
To: Desiree Miloshevic , Cooperation Working Group
Cc: Sebastien Bachollet
Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] DNS4EU - proposal for a community response - draft
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please use caution when opening attachments
Dear Desiree,
on this, speaking from a personal perspective and not EURALO, which I'll
leave to Sébastien Bachollet, I should add that I agree with the points
the Statement makes, with the added point that the inherent robustness
of the Internet has always been due to its diversity: diverse
I think issuing the statement is a good idea.
Maybe you want to add a point that there is a risk of disruption of service
when changing something that has been working for more than 25 years?
Salam
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 8:16 PM Desiree Miloshevic
wrote:
> Dear members, dear all
>
> Further to
Dear members, dear all
Further to the RIPE NCC’s summary of the DNS4EU Open House discussion and
further to your witnessing of our earlier 'transparent wordsmithing
consultation' with other RIPE - WG Chairs,
I’d like to propose the following high level statement draft for your
consideration.
