Re: RFR: JDK-8013225: Refresh jdk's private ASM to the latest.

2013-05-01 Thread A. Sundararajan
Hi Kumar, So long as those nashorn tests (jtreg tests under $jdk/test/javax/script, $jdk/sun/tools/jrunscript, $nashorn/test and nashorn ant tests - $nashorn/make - ant test) run fine, we've no objections from nashorn team. Thanks -Sundar On Tuesday 30 April 2013 03:55 AM, Kumar Srinivasan

Re: RFR: JDK-8013225: Refresh jdk's private ASM to the latest.

2013-04-29 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
The restyling changes obfustucated things a bit but I didn't see anything of concern in casual review. I had hoped to see the updated SmallSet that didn't try to implement Iterator directly. It looks the SmallSet needs more discussion.. barring that anyone else have any other concerns

Re: RFR: JDK-8013225: Refresh jdk's private ASM to the latest.

2013-04-26 Thread Paul Sandoz
On Apr 26, 2013, at 1:26 AM, Kumar Srinivasan kumar.x.sriniva...@oracle.com wrote: On 4/25/2013 3:53 PM, Mike Duigou wrote: The restyling changes obfustucated things a bit but I didn't see anything of concern in casual review. I had hoped to see the updated SmallSet that didn't try to

Re: RFR: JDK-8013225: Refresh jdk's private ASM to the latest.

2013-04-26 Thread Remi Forax
On 04/26/2013 01:43 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: On Apr 26, 2013, at 1:26 AM, Kumar Srinivasan kumar.x.sriniva...@oracle.com wrote: On 4/25/2013 3:53 PM, Mike Duigou wrote: The restyling changes obfustucated things a bit but I didn't see anything of concern in casual review. I had hoped to see

Re: RFR: JDK-8013225: Refresh jdk's private ASM to the latest.

2013-04-26 Thread Paul Sandoz
On Apr 26, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote: On 04/26/2013 01:43 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: On Apr 26, 2013, at 1:26 AM, Kumar Srinivasan kumar.x.sriniva...@oracle.com wrote: On 4/25/2013 3:53 PM, Mike Duigou wrote: The restyling changes obfustucated things a bit but I

Re: RFR: JDK-8013225: Refresh jdk's private ASM to the latest.

2013-04-26 Thread Brian Goetz
How many years ago was this done? Hasn't the hardware reality changed since then? What might have been a justifiable crime then may just be a crime now. On Apr 26, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote: On Apr 26, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Remi Forax fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote: On 04/26/2013

Re: RFR: JDK-8013225: Refresh jdk's private ASM to the latest.

2013-04-26 Thread Noel Poore
Brian For any individual case, there is always an argument that adding a couple of extra classes won't matter, but if that is the answer to every question, the result is something slow and bloated. Also, what frequently happens is that hardware advances are used to deliver lower cost rather

RFR: JDK-8013225: Refresh jdk's private ASM to the latest.

2013-04-25 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
Hello, Please review changes which essentially contains asm5_future in asm's mainline repository, I have tested this patch with Nashorn (so has Sundar), as well as Lambda's usage. Fixes that I know of: 1. supports v52.0 class files and JSR 308/Type Annotations changes Thanks to Remi 2.

Re: RFR: JDK-8013225: Refresh jdk's private ASM to the latest.

2013-04-25 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
Here is the webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8013225/webrev.0/ Thanks Kumar Hello, Please review changes which essentially contains asm5_future in asm's mainline repository, I have tested this patch with Nashorn (so has Sundar), as well as Lambda's usage. Fixes that I know of:

Re: RFR: JDK-8013225: Refresh jdk's private ASM to the latest.

2013-04-25 Thread Mike Duigou
The restyling changes obfustucated things a bit but I didn't see anything of concern in casual review. I had hoped to see the updated SmallSet that didn't try to implement Iterator directly. Looks OK. The testing, which you have done, is the important qualifier for this change. Mike On Apr

Re: RFR: JDK-8013225: Refresh jdk's private ASM to the latest.

2013-04-25 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
On 4/25/2013 3:53 PM, Mike Duigou wrote: The restyling changes obfustucated things a bit but I didn't see anything of concern in casual review. I had hoped to see the updated SmallSet that didn't try to implement Iterator directly. Remi, Paul and Brian discussed that and struck a deal,