Re: [coreboot] coreboot and MSM800BEV

2010-01-15 Thread Stefan Reinauer
On 1/15/10 12:57 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: Unfortunately, msrtool is not currently available as payload, but perhaps coreinfo can be used to display MSRs? (It would be nice to have msrtool diff mode available in coreinfo, using a file stored in cbfs for comparison!) I think a diff mode

[coreboot] Seabios problems

2010-01-15 Thread congedete
Hello, I wanted to upgrade my seabios version, but some troubles arrived. 0.5.0 : keyboard timeout problem (I think) error: ps2_recvbyte timeout keyboard self test failed (got e0 not 0xaa) 0.5.1 : same problem as 0.5.0 and Vista don't want to boot

[coreboot] Best way to use crossgcc

2010-01-15 Thread Joseph Smith
Hello, What is the best way to build programs using the crossgcc tool? I just added something like: export PATH=$PATH:/path/to/crossgcc/bin to my .bashrc in my home directory. It seems to work ok, but is that the best way to use it? -- Thanks, Joseph Smith Set-Top-Linux www.settoplinux.org

Re: [coreboot] Best way to use crossgcc

2010-01-15 Thread Patrick Georgi
Am 15.01.2010 15:44, schrieb Joseph Smith: Hello, What is the best way to build programs using the crossgcc tool? I just added something like: export PATH=$PATH:/path/to/crossgcc/bin to my .bashrc in my home directory. It seems to work ok, but is that the best way to use it? abuild

[coreboot] Trac reminder: list of new ticket(s)

2010-01-15 Thread coreboot tracker
Ticket Owner Status Description #154 carldani new Flashing BIOSes from Fujitsu/Siemens is not supported #153 stepan new resume from suspend on epia-m #152 carldani new v3 Geode cs5536 UART2 wrongly configured

[coreboot] Expresscard Booting Support

2010-01-15 Thread n. prince
Gentlemen, Can Coreboot support multiple PCMCIA ExpressCards  like  an 8 raid setup. Will it support hot swap, hot plug-n-play and auto-configuration.  Will it enable booting  an OS from  an Expresscard.  Will it support advance Expresscard support. All other Bios Firmware

[coreboot] [MSRTOOL][PATCH] Add Geode GX2 processor support.

2010-01-15 Thread Nils
Stefan, Thanks for the review and commit ! Nils. -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] [commit] r5008 - trunk/util/msrtool

2010-01-15 Thread Peter Stuge
s...@coreboot.org wrote: Support for the AMD Geode GX2 Processors to Msrtool. It seems to work as it was tested Please do not accept it seems to work for new register descriptions, always review them against the available documentation. Thanks. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list:

Re: [coreboot] coreboot and MSM800BEV

2010-01-15 Thread Peter Stuge
Piotr Piwko wrote: ./msrtool 0x20{18,19,1a,1b,1c,1d} 0x4c{0f,14} OK, here is my output: 0x2018 = 0x100770144840 0x2019 = 0x18006a7332a3 0x201a = 0x130cd101 0x201b = 0x 0x201c = 0x00ff00ff 0x201d =

Re: [coreboot] [commit] r5008 - trunk/util/msrtool

2010-01-15 Thread Stefan Reinauer
On 1/15/10 8:20 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: s...@coreboot.org wrote: Support for the AMD Geode GX2 Processors to Msrtool. It seems to work as it was tested Please do not accept it seems to work for new register descriptions, always review them against the available documentation.

Re: [coreboot] [commit] r5008 - trunk/util/msrtool

2010-01-15 Thread Peter Stuge
Stefan Reinauer wrote: Please do not accept it seems to work for new register descriptions, I figured nobody has the time to check this, not even the author of msrtool. Someone else using GX2 might hav been motivated (though they didn't speak up so far) or after the reminder maybe someone

Re: [coreboot] [commit] r5008 - trunk/util/msrtool

2010-01-15 Thread Joseph Smith
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:27:15 +0100, Stefan Reinauer ste...@coresystems.de wrote: On 1/15/10 8:20 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: s...@coreboot.org wrote: Support for the AMD Geode GX2 Processors to Msrtool. It seems to work as it was tested Please do not accept it seems to work for new register

[coreboot] AMD CAR questions

2010-01-15 Thread Rudolf Marek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, While thinking how to implement the resume without memory hole I came cross following piece of code in AMD CAR: set_init_ram_access(); /* So we can access RAM from [1M, CONFIG_RAMTOP) */ print_debug(Copying data from cache to RAM --

Re: [coreboot] #133: Create a typical failures FAQ

2010-01-15 Thread coreboot
#133: Create a typical failures FAQ +--- Reporter: stuge| Owner: somebody Type: enhancement |Status: closed Priority: major| Milestone:

Re: [coreboot] #123: layout file

2010-01-15 Thread coreboot
#123: layout file +--- Reporter: viva...@…| Owner: somebody Type: defect |Status: closed Priority: major| Milestone: flashrom

Re: [coreboot] #119: Winbond W39V040FBPZ is not written correctly by flashrom

2010-01-15 Thread coreboot
#119: Winbond W39V040FBPZ is not written correctly by flashrom -+-- Reporter: charles.hern...@… | Owner: somebody Type: enhancement| Status: new

Re: [coreboot] #103: flashrom: Add -T to test all operations in one invocation (was: flashrom: Don't exit() after successful erase; enable testing all operations in one invocation)

2010-01-15 Thread coreboot
#103: flashrom: Add -T to test all operations in one invocation -+-- Reporter: stuge | Owner: hailfinger Type: enhancement| Status: new Priority: major

Re: [coreboot] #106: flashrom: Add -T to automatically test all flash chip operations

2010-01-15 Thread coreboot
#106: flashrom: Add -T to automatically test all flash chip operations +--- Reporter: stuge| Owner: somebody Type: enhancement |Status: closed Priority: major

Re: [coreboot] AMD CAR questions

2010-01-15 Thread Rudolf Marek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thanks for the analysis. I can see it being useful for other things too. Ok. My understanding was that CAR refers to L2. As long as nothing gets replaced from the L2, everything is as it should be. ROM contents can always be fetched again, so

Re: [coreboot] #101: flashrom: Remove pciutils check from Makefile

2010-01-15 Thread Peter Stuge
coreboot wrote: * resolution: = fixed Comment: This has been solved by making the libpci check conditional on actually needing libpci (i.e. not for the serial and USB and dummy flashers). I disagree with this. The point was to create a configure script and check for pciutils one time

Re: [coreboot] AMD CAR questions

2010-01-15 Thread Myles Watson
My understanding was that CAR refers to L2. As long as nothing gets replaced from the L2, everything is as it should be. ROM contents can always be fetched again, so that's not critical for correctness. This is OK, but L2 CAR is in more detail described in fam11h otherwise AMD always

Re: [coreboot] AMD CAR questions

2010-01-15 Thread Myles Watson
It clearly shows that L2 is used for this kind of things. Was this intended? The L2 I think contains also the cached ROM code... so situation is bit more complicated than one can expect. Thanks for the analysis. I can see it being useful for other things too. My understanding was that CAR

Re: [coreboot] #120: flashrom: ICH SPI Hardware Sequencing

2010-01-15 Thread coreboot
#120: flashrom: ICH SPI Hardware Sequencing -+-- Reporter: t...@… | Owner: stuge Type: enhancement| Status: assigned Priority: major |

Re: [coreboot] #104: flashrom: Partial operations; change flash drivers to not erase in the write function

2010-01-15 Thread coreboot
#104: flashrom: Partial operations; change flash drivers to not erase in the write function ---+ Reporter: stuge| Owner: hailfinger Type: enhancement | Status: new

Re: [coreboot] #104: flashrom: Partial operations; change flash drivers to not erase in the write function

2010-01-15 Thread coreboot
#104: flashrom: Partial operations; change flash drivers to not erase in the write function ---+ Reporter: stuge| Owner: hailfinger Type: enhancement | Status: new

Re: [coreboot] #101: flashrom: Remove pciutils check from Makefile

2010-01-15 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 16.01.2010 00:55, Peter Stuge wrote: coreboot wrote: * resolution: = fixed Comment: This has been solved by making the libpci check conditional on actually needing libpci (i.e. not for the serial and USB and dummy flashers). I disagree with this. The point was to create

Re: [coreboot] #104: flashrom: Partial operations; change flash drivers to not erase in the write function

2010-01-15 Thread coreboot
#104: flashrom: Partial operations; change flash drivers to not erase in the write function ---+ Reporter: stuge| Owner: hailfinger Type: enhancement | Status: new

Re: [coreboot] #104: flashrom: Partial operations; change flash drivers to not erase in the write function

2010-01-15 Thread coreboot
#104: flashrom: Partial operations; change flash drivers to not erase in the write function ---+ Reporter: stuge| Owner: hailfinger Type: enhancement | Status: new

Re: [coreboot] #104: flashrom: Partial operations; change flash drivers to not erase in the write function

2010-01-15 Thread coreboot
#104: flashrom: Partial operations; change flash drivers to not erase in the write function ---+ Reporter: stuge| Owner: hailfinger Type: enhancement | Status:

Re: [coreboot] #104: flashrom: Partial operations; change flash drivers to not erase in the write function

2010-01-15 Thread coreboot
#104: flashrom: Partial operations; change flash drivers to not erase in the write function ---+ Reporter: stuge| Owner: hailfinger Type: enhancement | Status:

Re: [coreboot] Seabios problems

2010-01-15 Thread Kevin O'Connor
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 02:27:39PM +0100, conged...@voila.fr wrote: Hello, I wanted to upgrade my seabios version, but some troubles arrived. 0.5.0 : keyboard timeout problem (I think) error: ps2_recvbyte timeout keyboard self test failed (got