Re: [coreboot] Newbee patch for A49LF040A (Alix2c2) please have a look.

2008-06-17 Thread Ward Vandewege
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 04:29:13PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Ah, this is broken... flashrom should not continue when it found a chip in a given memory area already. flashrom supports boards with more than one flash chip.

Re: [coreboot] Newbee patch for A49LF040A (Alix2c2) please have a look.

2008-06-17 Thread Ward Vandewege
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:08:58PM -0400, Ward Vandewege wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 04:29:13PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Ah, this is broken... flashrom should not continue when it found a chip in a given memory area

Re: [coreboot] Newbee patch for A49LF040A (Alix2c2) please have a look.

2008-06-07 Thread Ward Vandewege
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:40:39PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Ouch. So one of the other probe functions kills communication. Can one of you try disabling other chip definitions in flashchips.c with #if 0 to narrow this problem down? This is the culprit: {Winbond, W29EE011,

Re: [coreboot] Newbee patch for A49LF040A (Alix2c2) please have a look.

2008-06-07 Thread jens
On 07.06.2008 05:47, Ward Vandewege wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 05:37:05AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Ouch. So one of the other probe functions kills communication. Can one of you try disabling other chip definitions in flashchips.c with #if 0 to narrow this problem down? I did

Re: [coreboot] Newbee patch for A49LF040A (Alix2c2) please have a look.

2008-06-07 Thread Stefan Reinauer
Ward Vandewege wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 03:40:35PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Ward Vandewege wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:40:39PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Ouch. So one of the other probe functions kills communication. Can one of you try

Re: [coreboot] Newbee patch for A49LF040A (Alix2c2) please have a look.

2008-06-07 Thread Peter Stuge
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Ah, this is broken... flashrom should not continue when it found a chip in a given memory area already. flashrom supports boards with more than one flash chip. But perhaps we need to teach flashrom more about how chips can be

Re: [coreboot] Newbee patch for A49LF040A (Alix2c2) please have a look.

2008-06-07 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 07.06.2008 16:29, Peter Stuge wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Ah, this is broken... flashrom should not continue when it found a chip in a given memory area already. flashrom supports boards with more than one flash chip. But perhaps we

Re: [coreboot] Newbee patch for A49LF040A (Alix2c2) please have a look.

2008-06-07 Thread Stefan Reinauer
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: On 07.06.2008 16:29, Peter Stuge wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Ah, this is broken... flashrom should not continue when it found a chip in a given memory area already. flashrom supports boards

Re: [coreboot] Newbee patch for A49LF040A (Alix2c2) please have a look.

2008-06-07 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 07.06.2008 18:37, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: On 07.06.2008 16:29, Peter Stuge wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 04:07:29PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Ah, this is broken... flashrom should not continue when it found a chip in a given

Re: [coreboot] Newbee patch for A49LF040A (Alix2c2) please have a look.

2008-06-06 Thread Ward Vandewege
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:55:50AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Hi Jens, On 07.06.2008 00:39, Jens Kuehnel wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger schrieb: I'd like to do that, but the patch was so mangled that I had problems reading it. It looks like you put vendor and device ID

Re: [coreboot] Newbee patch for A49LF040A (Alix2c2) please have a look.

2008-06-06 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 07.06.2008 05:17, Ward Vandewege wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 01:55:50AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Hi Jens, On 07.06.2008 00:39, Jens Kuehnel wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger schrieb: I'd like to do that, but the patch was so mangled that I had problems