Re: [COSE] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers-09: (with COMMENT)

2023-11-28 Thread Michael Jones
Thanks Éric. The "should" you're referring to is in the Privacy Considerations section. I've generally followed the convention that RFC 2119 language is only used to impose normative requirements in the main body of the specification and not in the Privacy Considerations or Security

[COSE] [IANA #1284212] expert review for draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers (cose)

2023-11-28 Thread Amanda Baber via RT
Hi Francesca and Carsten, This is a reminder that if we don't receive an expert approval by tomorrow, we'll have to mark this document "IANA NOT OK." thanks, Amanda On Tue Nov 28 17:57:10 2023, david.dong wrote: > Hi Francesca and Carsten, > > Following up again on this; could you let us know

[COSE] [IANA #1284212] expert review for draft-ietf-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers (cose)

2023-11-28 Thread David Dong via RT
Hi Francesca and Carsten, Following up again on this; could you let us know if this COSE Header Parameters registration can now be approved? This document is on the agenda for the November 30 IESG telechat; thank you. Best regards, David Dong IANA Services Sr. Specialist On Wed Nov 22