On 7/24/2008, Giuliano Gavazzi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well, presumably you haven't used Mail.app on MacOS.
Your presumption would be wrong... my Mom has had a Mac since forever,
and I'm her tech guy. We had a lot of problems for a long time trying to
get her comfortably using IMAP... she
On F 18 Jul, 2008, at 15:19 , Simon wrote:
I think TBird rocks... it ain't perfect, no... my biggest gripe is the
lack of a proper signature manager, and a few other minor gripes
(rewrapping quotes in replies, Quote only selected text, etc), but
honestly, with the right extensions and JS
On 7/18/2008, Sam Varshavchik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Actually, it's just bad GUI.
Arguable that it is 'bad' gui though...
Maybe its just the gui designers way to easily give the user the option
of attaching a link or the actual file...
It should be documented though...
On 7/17/2008 5:36 PM, Enda wrote:
I don't know that thunderbird has IMAP issues, but it sure has
usability issues for users I put into it. Simple things that work so
well in other clients like dragging a file into a composition window
creating a local link to a file instead of attaching it
Simon writes:
On 7/17/2008 5:36 PM, Enda wrote:
I don't know that thunderbird has IMAP issues, but it sure has
usability issues for users I put into it. Simple things that work so
well in other clients like dragging a file into a composition window
creating a local link to a file instead of
Jay Lee wrote:
What issues have you had with Thunderbird? We have hundreds of TB
clients connecting without IMAP issues. Maybe you should describe your
problems here... You seem to be having issues with large mailboxes but
you don't define what humongous is (1,000 messages? 10,000? 100,000
Jay and Simon, thanks for your replies. I was brought to think that
Thunderbird had problems by some messages on this list, from May IIRC.
We have had problems in the past on some machines using Thunderbird,
but that was with old machines (and we use SSL that is no lighweight).
We have no
