Jesse,
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:06:38 - (GMT)
Robin Bowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# For example, somewhere in the RPM build instructions, it wouldn't be
# unreasonable to say In order to build this package you need the
# following packages installed: blah, blah, FAM, blah
#
# After
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 17:35:56 - (GMT)
Robin Bowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Let's face it, one of the main attractions of the rpm paradigm is
# that it means that, ahem, less technically adept people can still
# build and install software. So potentially, the users who are
# perhaps most
Sam,
Anyone who uses --nodeps on a production server needs to have his head
examined.
I agree. However, my box is not a production server, it's one I experiment
with at home.
All of this is getting away from the thrust of my original point which is
that courier-imap does not *need* FAM - it
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Robin Bowes wrote:
FAM may be available to all recent versions of Red Hat but that
doesn't mean that it is installed. xinetd is available to all recent
versions of Red Hat but that doesn't mean it is installed on every
server.
I think you're missing the point here.
Juha,
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Robin Bowes wrote:
FAM may be available to all recent versions of Red Hat but that
doesn't mean that it is installed. xinetd is available to all recent
versions of Red Hat but that doesn't mean it is installed on every
server.
I think you're missing the
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:06:38 - (GMT)
Robin Bowes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# For example, somewhere in the RPM build instructions, it wouldn't be
# unreasonable to say In order to build this package you need the
# following packages installed: blah, blah, FAM, blah
#
# After all, it's
Sam,
FAM is optional, however it does provide for some value-added
functionality. In the event that the additional value-added functionality
is expected, the dependency provides a hint that the required prerequisites
are missing.
Ok. Can you document this in the php build instructions?
Robin Bowes writes:
Sam,
FAM is optional, however it does provide for some value-added
functionality. In the event that the additional value-added functionality
is expected, the dependency provides a hint that the required prerequisites
are missing.
Ok. Can you document this in the php build
Juri,
[root@celery i386]# rpm -Uvh fam*
error: Failed dependencies:
portmap is needed by fam-2.6.8-4
libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by fam-2.6.8-4
[more failed dependencies]
Uhm, where do you have this fam-version from? The one distributed with
RedHat-7.2 (you
Robin Bowes wrote:
When I say I use Redhat 7.2 I mean that that's what I originally
installed. I've got a lot of later versions of software installed from
when I attempted to install apache2 from rpms so I tend to use later rpms
from, e.g. Redhat 8.0.
Well, then there's nothing Sam can do
Juri,
Robin Bowes wrote:
When I say I use Redhat 7.2 I mean that that's what I originally
installed. I've got a lot of later versions of software installed from
when I attempted to install apache2 from rpms so I tend to use later rpms
from, e.g. Redhat 8.0.
Well, then there's nothing Sam
Sam,
Robin Bowes writes:
Sam,
FAM is optional, however it does provide for some value-added
functionality. In the event that the additional value-added functionality
is expected, the dependency provides a hint that the required
prerequisites
are missing.
Ok. Can you document this in the
Robin Bowes writes:
libstdc++.so.5 installed (from libstdc++-3.2-0.1) and I managed to
install fam using the --nodeps option.
Congratulations -- you have a completely broken server.
Hmmm. What leads you to that conclusion? Ok, so it's not going to win any
prizes for the cleanest package set
13 matches
Mail list logo
