SMAP was [Re: [courier-users] Re: Disk quota problem]

2003-10-14 Thread Thomas von Hassel
On Monday, October 13, 2003, at 04:14 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I just can't help but make a side observation that these kinds of clumsy ways of doing basic stuff with mail, via IMAP, were one of the reasons why I designed and implemented the experimental SMAP protocol, in Courier-IMAP 2.x.

Re: SMAP was [Re: [courier-users] Re: Disk quota problem]

2003-10-14 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Thomas von Hassel writes: On Monday, October 13, 2003, at 04:14 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I just can't help but make a side observation that these kinds of clumsy ways of doing basic stuff with mail, via IMAP, were one of the reasons why I designed and implemented the experimental SMAP

Re: SMAP was [Re: [courier-users] Re: Disk quota problem]

2003-10-14 Thread Thomas von Hassel
On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 12:35 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Thomas von Hassel writes: On Monday, October 13, 2003, at 04:14 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I just can't help but make a side observation that these kinds of clumsy ways of doing basic stuff with mail, via IMAP, were one of the

Re: SMAP was [Re: [courier-users] Re: Disk quota problem]

2003-10-14 Thread Matthew Wilson
On Oct 14, 2003, at 12:09 AM, Thomas von Hassel wrote: On Monday, October 13, 2003, at 04:14 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I just can't help but make a side observation that these kinds of clumsy ways of doing basic stuff with mail, via IMAP, were one of the reasons why I designed and implemented

Re: SMAP was [Re: [courier-users] Re: Disk quota problem]

2003-10-14 Thread Jesse Keating
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 03:35, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I suppose that if you have a favorite open source mail client, you could pass along upstream some mild comments how useful you find some of the SMAP-specific particulars, enumerated at http://www.courier-mta.org/cone/. Speaking of cone,