Re: [courier-users] Filter API

Lorenzo Perone wrote: ic - what do you mean by injecting? copies of the [modified] ctrl and msg files in courier's spool dirs? Nope. I call submit and feed it the same data that esmtpd does. I think. - Take Surveys.

Re: [courier-users] Ldap Authentication

Vikas Kadam wrote: I have Installed and Configure qmail+ldap+pop3 which are working fine. I have installed Courier-imap-4.0.2 and courier-authlib but I am not able to authenticate through My Ldap Server. It gives me following Error Msg. ... a1 login sagar redhat * BYE Temporary problem,

Re: [courier-users] Help a journalist: What do you wish the CIO understood about fighting spam?

Esther Schindler wrote: /***If you could get your CIO (or top management) to understand one thing, just ONE thing, about fighting spam, what would it be?***/ Don't try to bounce spam - just quietly accept it and bin it later: if that requires an upgrade to your mail server to handle it, then

[courier-users] Blowfish for passwd encryption in a postfix-mysql-courier system

Hi, I'm moving a Suse based server: 3000 accounts, MTA: Sendmail, passwd/shadow auth. The new server its Fedora Core 6 with Postfix-Courier-MySQL. SuSe use Blowfish to save the passwords, but Fedora does not recognize this kind of encryption. Compiling libxcrypt and pam_unix2 Fedora can

Re: [courier-users] Blowfish for passwd encryption in a postfix-mysql-courier system

Omar Martinez wrote: Hi, I'm moving a Suse based server: 3000 accounts, MTA: Sendmail, passwd/shadow auth. The new server its Fedora Core 6 with Postfix-Courier-MySQL. Why would you move to a platform that is going to be obsolete in a years time? Fedora is a very bad choice for a server

Re: [courier-users] Catch-all accounts

On 1/9/07, Milan Obuch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 09 January 2007 23:19, Bambero wrote: Hello I'm using userdb authorization only (authmodulelist=authuserdb), but I want to use catch-all accounts too. For ex. @mydomain.com: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is it possible with userdb ?

Re: [courier-users] courier-users Digest, Vol 9, Issue 13

Hi, thanks for the info. I had a quick look at the mailman homepage - looks good. Alles Gute, Bernd On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:02:08 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 差出人: Bernd Wurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] 宛先:: courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net 件名: Re: [courier-users] Courier and ezmlm-idx 日付:

Re: [courier-users] Help a journalist: What do you wish the CIO understood about fighting spam?

Esther Schindler wrote: /***If you could get your CIO (or top management) to understand one thing, just ONE thing, about fighting spam, what would it be?***/ Remember your mailbox next time you vote. And the follow-up: why did you pick that one item? The plan for spam, content filtering,

[courier-users] filtering mail in a backup-mx

Hi, I use courier-mta at another machine which acts as a backup-mx. It doesn't have any local users, just a few domains in its esmtacceptmailfor. This works great so long, but I'd like to pipe all mails through spamassassin and clamassassin. A setup using maildrop and xfilter already exists

Re: [courier-users] filtering mail in a backup-mx

Manuel Schneider [Everything Open] writes: Hi, I use courier-mta at another machine which acts as a backup-mx. It doesn't have any local users, just a few domains in its esmtacceptmailfor. This works great so long, but I'd like to pipe all mails through spamassassin and clamassassin. A

Re: [courier-users] filtering mail in a backup-mx

Any ideas? Yes. Get rid of your backup MX. A backup MX is no longer needed on the modern Internet. Very funny. -- - All-Things-Open Projektgruppe [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: [courier-users] filtering mail in a backup-mx

hi On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Manuel Schneider [Everything Open] wrote: Yes. Get rid of your backup MX. A backup MX is no longer needed on the modern Internet. Very funny. He's right, unless your backup MX can reject mail for non-existent users at your domain instead of accepting it, so you

Re: [courier-users] Blowfish for passwd encryption in a postfix-mysql-courier system

Jay Lee wrote: Omar Martinez wrote: Hi, I'm moving a Suse based server: 3000 accounts, MTA: Sendmail, passwd/shadow auth. The new server its Fedora Core 6 with Postfix-Courier-MySQL. Why would you move to a platform that is going to be obsolete in a years time? Fedora is a very bad

Re: [courier-users] filtering mail in a backup-mx

Manuel Schneider [Everything Open] wrote: Any ideas? Yes. Get rid of your backup MX. A backup MX is no longer needed on the modern Internet. Very funny. What makes you think it's a joke? I'll admit, I have a backup MX at the site where I work, but that's only for political reasons. A

Re: [courier-users] filtering mail in a backup-mx

Hi. Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 08:39 schrieb Gordon Messmer: A backup MX's job is to accept mail when your primary system can't, but remote sites are going to queue mail and retry delivery anyway. You're not going to hurt site reliability by taking down you backup MX. Two things here: 1.