On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:59:32PM -0400, Jesse Vincent wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:53:45PM -0400, David Golden wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Adam Kennedy a...@ali.as wrote:
I've been meaning to propose for a while that for CPAN Perl 5 we drop
support for everything
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:59:32PM -0400, Jesse Vincent wrote: Forcing an
extension makes all sorts of tools that previously just
worked with a tarball suddenly start to fail.
We've dealt with it in the past.
However, I'm
This has already existed for about a year or more.
See pip's .p5i file (which I think cpanminus also supports).
Adam K
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Curtis Jewell
lists.perl.cpan-work...@csjewell.fastmail.us wrote:
Why don't we make the .cpan/.c6pan file (.c6pan) a JSON file, generated
by
Larry points out that the shibboleth for Perl 6 code is:
: No package statements. Instead, you'll see module statements.
That ought to be a pretty reasonable way for the indexer to know it's
Perl 6 code in the absence of other markers. I do think that xdg's plan
to have an at-upload-time flag
# from Jesse Vincent
# on Thursday 15 April 2010 09:24:
-1 ... Forcing an extension makes all sorts of tools that
previously just worked with a tarball suddenly start to fail.
Which tools are going to just work on a perl 6 tarball? If it's a
generic tar tool, it should still just work
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 08:56:04AM -0600, Curtis Jewell wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:59:32PM -0400, Jesse Vincent wrote: Forcing
an extension makes all sorts of tools that previously just
worked with a
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Barbie wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 08:56:04AM -0600, Curtis Jewell wrote:
Why don't we make the .cpan/.c6pan file (.c6pan) a JSON file, generated
by PAUSE once the tarball is uploaded, with whatever information is
required (a reference to the tarball, what version of
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Barbie wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:50:29PM -0700, Jan Dubois wrote:
PPM4 actually supports putting the PPD file inside the tarball. When the
tarball is downloaded with a .ppmx extension, then the client knows to
extract the .ppd from inside the file and install
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:29:21AM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
But perl6 is not a version of perl5.
I know this is a contentious issue but, with all dure respect, I disagree.
I believe that's a short-sighted viewpoint that has some value in the
short term but is likely to lead us to make
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 22:23, Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:29:21AM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
But perl6 is not a version of perl5.
I know this is a contentious issue but, with all dure respect, I disagree.
FWIW I thought the now-deleted 'language' key in
# from Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
# on Thursday 15 April 2010 15:48:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 22:23, Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:29:21AM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
It's also the wrong place to encode version information.
But perl6 is not a version of perl5.
I
I'm pretty sure that's true for all such systems, including things
like .war files.
Even if we split, say, Strawberry from ActivePerl, what if you have
multiple installations of ActivePerl?
Adam K
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Jan Dubois j...@activestate.com wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010,
12 matches
Mail list logo
