On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Ricardo Signes
perl.cpanw...@rjbs.manxome.org wrote:
* David Golden xda...@gmail.com [2009-10-09T07:42:06]
02. Formally switch to YAML Tiny
Branch available: http://github.com/rjbs/cpan-meta-spec/commits/02-yamltiny
If we only make this change and not JSON,
On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:11 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
* David Golden xda...@gmail.com [2009-10-09T07:42:06]
02. Formally switch to YAML Tiny
Proposal:
Change the language referring to YAML to instead refer to YAML
Tiny and
update the specification URL to point to the YAML Tiny specification.
Ricardo Signes wrote:
* David Golden xda...@gmail.com [2009-10-09T07:42:06]
02. Formally switch to YAML Tiny
Proposal:
Change the language referring to YAML to instead refer to YAML Tiny and
update the specification URL to point to the YAML Tiny specification.
(AdamKennedy)
Accept with
* Steffen Mueller nj88ud...@sneakemail.com [2009-10-09T10:04:44]
As for adopting JSON as the default format: What's the chances of
including a full JSON parser in core?
I believe they are good. JSON.pm has no weird prereqs, works admirably, and
the author has no objections.
--
rjbs
Ricardo Signes wrote:
* Steffen Mueller nj88ud...@sneakemail.com [2009-10-09T10:04:44]
As for adopting JSON as the default format: What's the chances of
including a full JSON parser in core?
I believe they are good. JSON.pm has no weird prereqs, works admirably, and
the author has no
On Oct 9, 2009, at 6:37 AM, David Golden wrote:
Accept with modification: YAML Tiny should be as the specification
for
YAML-like META files, which should be deprecated in favor of META
files encoded
in JSON.
Agreed, assuming JSON is agreed as the spec going forward.
+1m though I have no
* David Golden xda...@gmail.com [2009-10-09T07:42:06]
02. Formally switch to YAML Tiny
Branch available: http://github.com/rjbs/cpan-meta-spec/commits/02-yamltiny
--
rjbs
7 matches
Mail list logo