I'd prefer we avoid pointless flexibility.
Recommend we pick one, and since underscore requires less quoting and
can be used as part of a method name, recommend we go with that.
Adam K
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 7:07 AM, David Golden xda...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:08 AM, David
On Oct 9, 2009, at 8:20 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
* David Golden xda...@gmail.com [2009-10-09T07:56:46]
34. Formally reserve keys for private 'in-house' use
Proposal:
For in-house, non-CPAN use, it would be nice to be able to extend
META.yml
to contain extra keys and data, but any
Graham Barr wrote:
* David Golden xda...@gmail.com [2009-10-09T07:56:46]
34. Formally reserve keys for private 'in-house' use
personally I dislike the case distinction and would rather switch to
using x- prefixes which are used in so many other places to mean private
extensions
+1
On Oct 9, 2009, at 8:06 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
personally I dislike the case distinction and would rather switch to
using x- prefixes which are used in so many other places to mean
private
extensions
I agree, but I also don't like the idea of in this zone of the
struct, case
4 matches
Mail list logo
