Re: Ports page - about to be reset - patches weclome!

2011-03-27 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-=| Mark A. Stratman, Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:13:09PM -0500 |=- Can somebody briefly explain the criteria for appending a '+patches' to the Perl version? e.g. as far as I can tell, every Debian perl package has patches (from looking at the debian package Changelog files), but only one is

Ports page - about to be reset - patches weclome!

2011-03-26 Thread Leo Lapworth
Hi, I cleaned out all the dead links from the ports page, which is what we went live with, but the content is WAY out of date, it is also not in a easy to review format and a lot of it is just not useful or points to very old versions of Perl and I have no way of knowing if that is the

Re: Ports page - about to be reset - patches weclome!

2011-03-26 Thread Mark A. Stratman
Can somebody briefly explain the criteria for appending a '+patches' to the Perl version? e.g. as far as I can tell, every Debian perl package has patches (from looking at the debian package Changelog files), but only one is flagged as such. I submitted a pull request with Ubuntu added to the

Re: Ports page - about to be reset - patches weclome!

2011-03-26 Thread Leo Lapworth
On 26 March 2011 17:13, Mark A. Stratman strat...@gmail.com wrote: Can somebody briefly explain the criteria for appending a '+patches' to the Perl version? Good question! e.g. as far as I can tell, every Debian perl package has patches (from looking at the debian package Changelog files),