Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
I really don't think we should have Perl data structures in files
(that means Perl code, right?), because that indicates doing an eval,
Not necessarily. Working in *a defined subset of* Perl syntax would mean
that readers have both options. Evaling would probably be
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:44 AM, David Golden xda...@gmail.com wrote:
06. Data structures, not YAML
Proposal:
The META spec should be defined in terms of (Perl) data structures, and not
in terms of YAML. (Slaven Rezic)
Comments:
* This does not mean that I want to replace YAML by a Perl
Ricardo Signes wrote:
* David Golden xda...@gmail.com [2009-10-09T07:44:43]
06. Data structures, not YAML
Proposal:
The META spec should be defined in terms of (Perl) data structures, and not
in terms of YAML. (Slaven Rezic)
Agreed, but the spec should be very clear (perhaps, as said, in an
* Jarkko Hietaniemi j...@iki.fi [2009-10-09T10:11:35]
I really don't think we should have Perl data structures in files
(that means Perl code, right?), because that indicates doing an eval,
and I don't want to eval any more random code off the 'net than
necessary.
Right. We definitely want a
On Oct 9, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
I really don't think we should have Perl data structures in files
(that means Perl code, right?), because that indicates doing an eval,
and I don't want to eval any more random code off the 'net than
necessary.
I strongly agree that we
5 matches
Mail list logo