-=| Graham Barr, Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:20:37AM -0500 |=-
On Oct 9, 2009, at 8:17 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
* David Golden xda...@gmail.com [2009-10-09T07:52:45]
23. Have a development version flag
Agreed.
* Con: Development version'ness would not be determinable post-
installation
* David Golden xda...@gmail.com [2009-10-09T07:52:45]
23. Have a development version flag
Agreed.
* Con: Development version'ness would not be determinable post-installation
AdamKennedy
Packlist 2.0?
--
rjbs
David Golden wrote:
23. Have a development version flag
* Con: Development version'ness would not be determinable post-installation
AdamKennedy
Correction to my earlier reply: If we have the META info available
*easily* post installation (cf. 33), my vote becomes a +1.
Steffen
On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:20 AM, Graham Barr wrote:
Packlist 2.0?
Agreed.
The main use of development status seems to be control if the
distribution is indexed as the latest released etc. So having a flag
instead of the hackish way we use _ seems a benefit.
+1
David
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Steffen Mueller
nj88ud...@sneakemail.com wrote:
David Golden wrote:
23. Have a development version flag
* Con: Development version'ness would not be determinable
post-installation
AdamKennedy
Correction to my earlier reply: If we have the META info
5 matches
Mail list logo