At 04:59 PM 5/22/01 -0400, Faustine wrote:
If some fed thought it would be a fine public service to post all of OUR
social security numbers online (truly easier than you know) would you still
~Faustine.
The Fedz *have* posted Tim's SSN involuntarily.
At 04:59 PM 5/22/2001 -0400, Faustine wrote:
If some fed thought it would be a fine public service to post all of OUR
social security numbers online (truly easier than you know) would you still
think this was anything to be glad about? The fact that such a powerful ID
number exists on anyone at
Quoting ming [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If SSN were completely open and available to all, would that be a
better scenerio? ie. If everyone could get anyone's social, would it have the
same importance as an id#?
Sure, universal access could be better, but it still depends on how it's used.
I don't
Quoting Steve Schear [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 04:59 PM 5/22/2001 -0400, Faustine wrote:
If some fed thought it would be a fine public service to post all of
OUR
social security numbers online (truly easier than you know) would you
still
think this was anything to be glad about? The fact that
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Faustine wrote:
Certainly you're right, generally speaking. But if you amble on over to
http://www.loompanics.com you can pick up books on any number of nifty frauds
you can commit with SSNs because of the way things are set up in the US today.
All the more reason to post
Quoting Sampo Syreeni [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Faustine wrote:
If some fed thought it would be a fine public service to post all of
OUR
social security numbers online (truly easier than you know) would you
still
think this was anything to be glad about? The fact that such
At 10:59 AM -0400 5/20/01, Declan McCullagh wrote:
At 11:29 AM 5/19/01 -0700, Tim May wrote:
The question I hope to hear from Declan on is whether the Kirkland
lawyers are citing some law against reporting on their cops, or
merely don't like what he did.
Neither, actually. They claim that I'm
Tim May wrote:
Is the entire nation bound by this quashing of free speech (and the
contravention of SCOTUS cases cited by you, Greg, and others)?
There are also Supreme Court decisions which support the Kirkland decision.
i.e. ...if States were required to choose between keeping proprietary
I apologize for not following the stuff.
Could someone please explain in few simple sentences what was the
reason for the original publishing of SSN data in the first place ?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great
At 08:39 AM 05/20/2001 -0700, Tim May wrote:
At 10:59 AM -0400 5/20/01, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Neither, actually. They claim that I'm acting in concert with
justicefiles.org by quoting three lines from the site. And, Kirkland
claims, that means I'm bound by the court's injunction against
At 09:27 AM 5/20/2001 -0700, Charles Farley wrote:
Tim May wrote:
Is the entire nation bound by this quashing of free speech (and the
contravention of SCOTUS cases cited by you, Greg, and others)?
There are also Supreme Court decisions which support the Kirkland decision.
i.e. ...if States
Tim writes:
[List of many orificers and their SS numbers snipped]
But Tim, don't you realize that you, by posting to the list, have just
placed the banned information into every single Cypherpunks archive on the
entire Internet?
Now there are many more URLs people can click on, to see the
Eric fingered:
But Tim, don't you realize that you, by posting to the list, have just
placed the banned information into every single Cypherpunks archive
on the entire Internet?
And that's why Tim will get a subpoena to a Grand Jury to explain
why he did this. And for him to deny who he is
13 matches
Mail list logo
