And who saw the arousing report in Saturday's New York
Times about the practice of bestiality, yes, sex with
animals, that is now coming out of the closet. The last
taboo is getting its day. One gent goes on talk shows
Necrophillia is the last taboo.
Really, in the New York Times,
On 12 Jun 2001, Nat Love wrote:
And whats to stop an untrustworthy virus from making the same claims,
placing the 'trustworthy' virus on the system and deleting itself?
Nothing, of course. It is a question of likelihood. And we were thinking
about *probable* cause, not evidence beyond
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out the house and, sure enough, the window has been broken into, and
right by the broken window is a pile of child porn. Wouldn't ANY sensible
person conclude that more likely than not it was planted there?
Except if the virus code is well
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
Except if the virus code is well known, and deemed trustworthy.
Any code can clean up after itself, leaving a well-known trustworthy
code behind.
I'm a bit boggled at seeing virus and trustworthy in the same
sentence.
-- Eugen* Leitl
A tactic used by the anti-pedo vigilantes and narcs is to
covertly bury pedo porno amongst adult porno and then
finger the adult downloaders as pedophiles knowing the
evidence will be found without the downloaders knowing
it is there until discovered during a raid.
A federal case here in
