At 06:41 PM 5/27/03 -0500, Roy M.Silvernail wrote:
How about simply holding companies absolutely responsible for the methods
used to distribute their advertising? Couldn't Truth In Advertising be
extended to email solicitation? The one thing that *all* UCE has in common
is the attempt to sell
On Wednesday, May 28, 2003, at 02:07 PM, John Kelsey wrote:
This is aside from the first amendment problems (it's commercial
speech, so it may be possible to get around those problems, but who
really knows?) with antispam laws.
It's useful to remember that newspapers are commercial
Perhaps rather than retaliating against spammers, as many here have
written about, we should be talking about mail-bombing and spam-bombing
any politician or lawmaker who supports anti-spam legislation.
--Tim May
Are you sure it won't be somehow counter-productive?
