In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Motyka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
- To supplement the current legal framework by the introduction of
obligations, together with penal sanctions, concerning the handing-over
to the legal authorities, when they require it, of the cleartext
version of
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Clive D.W. Feather
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 4:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: France Allows 128 Bit Crypto
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Motyka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
Intel has announced a number of interesting things at the RSA conference.
The most important, to me, is the inclusion of a hardware random number
generator (based on thermal noise) in the Pentium III instruction set.
They also announced hardware support for IPSEC.
Jim Foti at NIST has put the Draft FIPS 46-3 at:
http://csrc.nist.gov/fips/dfips46-3.pdf (209K)
We offer an HTML version:
http://jya.com/dfips46-3.htm (49K + 35K images)
On Jan 19, 10:40pm, Black Unicorn wrote:
Subject: RE: France Allows 128 Bit Crypto
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Michael Motyka
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 1999 8:31 PM
To: Enzo Michelangeli
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
Steve Bellovin wrote:
Intel has announced a number of interesting things at the RSA conference.
The most important, to me, is the inclusion of a hardware random number
generator (based on thermal noise) in the Pentium III instruction set.
They also announced hardware support for IPSEC.
An
Black Unicorn writes:
WOAH. Are you sure you know what you are doing? You're close to imposing a
duty to decrypt punishable by penal sanctions (read jailtime). This is
precisely the WRONG way to go.
Sure, because you can't tell the difference between someone who is
unable to decrypt
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Black Unicorn wrote:
It says "handing-over ... of the cleartext version". In other words, a
power to request plaintext under warrant. Not the key.
If you accept the sense in a law to allow law enforcement to seize
documents with a search warrant, then you should
At 08:56 PM 1/20/99 +, Ben Laurie wrote:
Steve Bellovin wrote:
Intel has announced a number of interesting things at the RSA conference.
The most important, to me, is the inclusion of a hardware random number
generator (based on thermal noise) in the Pentium III instruction set.
They
--- begin forwarded text
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 14:36:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Phil Agre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Red Rock Eater News Service" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [RRE]Authenticity, Social Accountability and Trust
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Rob Lemos wrote:
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2189721,00.html
From this article:
"This kills theft," said one cryptographer at this week's RSA
Data Security Conference, who had been briefed by Intel on its
plans. "As soon as you
Rob Lemos wrote:
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2189721,00.html
This just seems like FUD to me. ID numbers should help detect theft and
fraud. They aren't going to compromise privacy. I expect it's going to behave
just like the debugging registers. Nobody is going to be able
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ben Laurie writes:
Steve Bellovin wrote:
Intel has announced a number of interesting things at the RSA conference.
The most important, to me, is the inclusion of a hardware random number
generator (based on thermal noise) in the Pentium III instruction set.
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, AI mailer v .1 alpha wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Black Unicorn wrote:
It says "handing-over ... of the cleartext version". In other words, a
power to request plaintext under warrant. Not the key.
If you accept the sense in a law to allow law enforcement to
14 matches
Mail list logo
