It's going to be hard to pick one of the five finalists. But if
the criteria remain (substantially) the same, I think the field
may be narrowed significantly. I'm making one very crucial assumption
here, of course -- that to the extent it is knowable, all five
finalists (Rijndael, MARS, RC6,
--- begin forwarded text
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 10:45:29 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Robert Huddleston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP: Clinton comes after the Internet by Joseph Farah
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Robert Huddleston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- begin forwarded text
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 1999 09:19:25 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Robert Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DCSB: Andrew Odlyzko; So, Where's All the Digital Cash?
Cc: Eben Moglen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Robert Hettinga
A working group like this with only two years to go in
an administration worrying about its place in history
must be one of two things, only:
1. we are referring this to committee so that we can say
we did something without having actually to do anything
(what is sometimes rendered in Italian
I have found this discussion very stimulating and enlightening. I'd
like to make a couple of comments:
1. Mr. Kelsey's argument that entropy should only be added in large
quanta is compelling, but I wonder if it goes far enough. I would
argue that entropy collected from different sources
"Arnold" == Arnold G Reinhold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Arnold I have found this discussion very stimulating and
Arnold enlightening. I'd like to make a couple of comments:
Arnold 1. Mr. Kelsey's argument that entropy should only be added in
Arnold large quanta is compelling, but I wonder
