At 10:16 AM 02/23/2000 -0800, Bill Stewart writes:
At 10:14 PM 02/21/2000 -0800, Greg Broiles wrote:
4759063 Blind signature systems (19 Jul 2005)
4529870 Cryptographic identification, financial transaction, and credential
device (16 Jul 2002)
Interesting - I wonder how much of the
lcs Mixmaster Remailer wrote:
What are the prospects for smartcard based systems within the U.S.? Such
cards are essentially nonexistent in commerce. Apparently in Europe and
Asia they are widely used, though, instead of the credit cards preferred
by Americans.
I wouldn't go so far as
The mainstrem American press has finally noticed Echelon. See
http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/02/biztech/articles/24spy.html
http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/02/biztech/articles/24secure.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24275-2000Feb23.html
At 10:44 PM 2/24/00 +, Ben Laurie wrote:
lcs Mixmaster Remailer wrote:
What are the prospects for smartcard based systems within the U.S.? Such
cards are essentially nonexistent in commerce. Apparently in Europe and
Asia they are widely used, though, instead of the credit cards preferred
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thu 02/24/00 at 06:02 PM -0500):
The mainstrem American press has finally noticed Echelon. See
http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/02/biztech/articles/24spy.html
heh. with notices like this one, we'd be better off if they
ignored it. i'm no fan of the Rag of Record,
[I won't be there -- I'll be in Boston at an EFF/Harvard-Berkman MP3
event. But it's fun to go to these, they enjoy our presence, and we
frequently learn things. --gnu]
Dear PECSENC,
At the end of this message is the announcement for the February 25th
meeting as it will appear in the Federal
At 03:56 PM 2/23/00 -0600, Rick Smith wrote:
Now, on the other hand, they could do smartcard sorts of things like the
satellite TV folks. That ups the ante, since you have to build in a
smartcard reader and do smartcard-based key management. I'll bet that none
of those costs are in their business