On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, David Honig wrote:
For $500/monthly you too can have a box in various NAPs. You can
run your NIC in Bill Clinton mode, e.g., to measure certain
things about traffic. I know of a corporation doing this (they
are only interested in infrastructure traffic, not content).
David Honig wrote:
At 10:58 AM 7/12/00 -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
There's been speculation about NSA black boxes in such facilities for
years. The FBI, however, isn't quite as "above the law" as the NSA likes
For $500/monthly you too can have a box in various NAPs. You can
run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Jeffrey I. Schiller wrote:
I suspect that the reason they would want Carnivore as opposed to
looking at spool files is that it is less invasive then looking at spool
files, isn't dependent on the technology choices made by the ISP and
Jeffrey Schiller asked:
I wonder how we find out more (FOIA), the descriptions I have heard so
far (its a sniffer) seems a bit onerous. Big Brother at his best!
At least one group I know of has filed a FOIA for details. Perhaps we'll get
information in a few weeks. Or maybe they will just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Rodger, William wrote:
Meyer wrote:
I guess this explains the FBI's opposition to the Verio
merger. I wonder
if a colocation company or service provider could be forced
to disclose
its participation in the Carnivore
I had posted a note saying that pen register usage in New York was
barred by the courts unless a wiretap warrant had been issued. I need
to update that posting.
First, that opinion was rendered in People vs. Bialostok, 80 NY2d 738,
http://www.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/nyctap.cgi?80+738 But it
moochers
!2713 NIST threatens antitrust against potential crypto patent moochers
But first, I have decided to file an opposition to the trademark application
for the phrase "patent busters". I just mailed off a request for an
extension in time to file a formal opposition reques
